Close X
Attorney Spotlight

What is Shannon Wiley looking forward to at this year's Asembia Specialty Pharmacy Summit? Find out more>


Close X


Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

Primary Care Providers Win Challenge of CMS Interpretation of Enhanced Payment Law

With the help and support of the Tennessee Medical Association, 21 Tennessee physicians of underserved communities joined together and retained Bass, Berry & Sims to file suit against the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to stop improper collection efforts. Our team, led by David King, was successful in halting efforts to recoup TennCare payments that were used legitimately to expand services in communities that needed them. Read more

Tennessee Medical Association & Bass, Berry & Sims

Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

Download the Healthcare Fraud & Abuse Review 2017, authored by Bass, Berry & Sims

The Healthcare Fraud & Abuse Review 2017 details all healthcare-related False Claims Act settlements from last year, organized by particular sectors of the healthcare industry. In addition to reviewing all healthcare fraud-related settlements, the Review includes updates on enforcement-related litigation involving the Stark Law and Anti-Kickback Statute, and looks at the continued implications from the government's focus on enforcement efforts involving individual actors in connection with civil and criminal healthcare fraud investigations.

Click here to download the Review.

Genesco / Finish Line Merger and Related Litigation

Client Type: Public Company

In June 2007, Bass, Berry & Sims represented Genesco Inc. in connection with the negotiation of a merger agreement for Genesco to be acquired by Finish Line for $1.5 billion. When the credit markets subsequently took a dive, Finish Line and its lender, UBS, refused to consummate the deal accusing the company of withholding key financial information and citing a material adverse change based on Genesco's weaker than expected results from the second and third quarter of 2007. Our litigation team filed suit (Genesco, Inc. v. Finish Line, Inc., Headwind, Inc., UBS Securities LLC and UBS Loan Finance LLC) to enforce the agreement asserting that there had been no fraud, that Genesco's recent performance was the result of general economic conditions which did not allow Finish Line to escape its obligations under the merger agreement, and that the merger agreement should be enforced as written.

On December 27, 2007, Tennessee Chancery Court Judge Ellen Hobbs Lyle ruled in favor of Genesco, dismissing all of Finish Line's arguments and rejecting claims that Genesco had committed fraud by concealing financial information and affirming that Finish Line had breached its merger agreement. Most significantly, Chancellor Lyle ordered that Finish Line must specifically perform its obligations under the merger agreement and close the transaction. The litigation was subsequently settled with Finish Line and UBS paying Genesco $175 million in cash plus 12% of Finish Line stock.

Genesco Inc. (NYSE: GCO) is a publicly owned specialty retailer of branded footwear, licensed and branded headwear and licensed sports apparel and accessories and is a wholesaler of branded and licensed footwear.

You Also May Be Interested In:

Related Professionals

Related Services


Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.