Close X
Attorney Spotlight

What emerging trend in shareholder litigation does Britt Latham find most interesting in his practice today?    Find out more>


Close X


Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

Envision to Sell to KKR for $9.9 Billion

We represented Envision Healthcare Corporation (NYSE: EVHC) in its definitive agreement to sell to KKR in an all-cash transaction for $9.9 billion, including debt. KKR will pay $46 per Envision share in cash to buy the company, marking a 32 percent premium to the company's volume-weighted average share price from November 1, when Envision announced it was considering its options. The transaction is expected to close the fourth quarter of 2018. Read more

Envision Healthcare

Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

Six Things to Know Before Buying a Physician Practice spotlight

Dermatology, ophthalmology, radiology, urology…the list goes on. Yet, in any physician practice management transaction, there are six key considerations that apply and, if not carefully managed, can derail a transaction. Download the 6 Things to Know Before Buying a Physician Practice to keep your physician practice management transactions on track.

Click here to download the guide.

Amy Sanders Morgan


(615) 742-7727 TEL
(615) 742-2761 FAX

Amy Sanders Morgan


(615) 742-7727 TEL
(615) 742-2761 FAX
(615) 742-7727 TEL
(615) 742-2761 FAX

Amy Sanders Morgan assists national healthcare providers with operational, regulatory, and transactional matters, offering practical guidance through the complex and ever-changing healthcare space. Amy works with public and private clients across a variety of industry sectors including hospitals and health systems, physician groups, ambulatory surgery centers, hospice and home health, long-term care, and specialty pharmacy. A former journalist, Amy thrives on staying abreast of healthcare developments relevant to clients, recognizing and advising on new areas of risk while analyzing potential growth opportunities. Amy has been published and quoted in local and national media outlets on issues related to implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA).

Amy's practice involves:

  • Mergers and acquisitions.

  • Advice on responding to governmental inquiries relating to Medicare and Medicaid fraud and the False Claims Act.

  • Regulatory compliance, including issues related to the Stark Law as well as state laws regarding fee splitting, corporate practice of medicine, and licensure.

  • Operational matters.

Before joining the firm's healthcare group, Amy gained experience working remotely as an intern with the Montgomery County Department of Health and Human Services in Rockville, Maryland. Within the Department's Policy and Operational Risk Office, she analyzed federal privacy and confidentiality statutes governing public health and social services to identify conflicts and recommend potential solutions.


American Health Lawyers Association (AHLA) — Health Care Reform Educational Task Force, Vice Chair (2015-2016)

American Bar Association

Leadership Health Care

Nashville Health Care Council

Nashville Library Foundation — Next Chapter Society Council

YWCA Nashville — Junior Board of Directors Committee


View More

Representative Experience

View More


View More

Past Events

View More

Media Mentions

View More

Additional Thought Leadership


  • "The ACA: Where are we? Where are we going? Are we there yet?" Tennessee Bar Association's 15th Annual Health Law Primer
  • "Evolving Payment Models and the Impending Supreme Court Decision," Fifth Third Bank
  • "Balance in Legal Education," Association of American Law Schools 2012 Annual Meeting
  • "We Want You (in Our Network)," NALP Annual Education Conference 2012


  • "Fallen Halos, Excessive Salaries, and Turning Yourself In: A Look Back at 2014 Stark Law Enforcement," AHLA Connections (February 2015)
  • "HHS Sets Explicit Goals to Shift Payments from Volume to Value . . . But How?" AHLA Post-Acute and Long Term Services Practice Group, Executive Summary (February 2015)
  • "A Gap in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Will Tax Credits Be Available for Insurance Purchased Through Federal Exchanges?," Vanderbilt Law Review (May 23, 2013)
  • "A Gap in PPACA: No Subsidies for Insurance Purchased from Federal Exchanges?" ABA Health eSource (September 2012)
  • "Hot Topics in Internet Law & Strategy," The SciTech Lawyer (Spring 2012)
  • "The Federal Response to Eliminate Eating Disorders: Does the FREED Act Have a Fighting Chance?," Vanderbilt Health Law and Public Policy Forum (Summer 2011)

In the News:

  • "Attorneys React to Supreme Court's ACA Save," Law360 (June 25, 2015)
  • "SCOTUS Decision Day Roundup: Supreme Court Upholds ACA Subsidies and Approves Disparate Impact Claims Under the Fair Housing Act," Supreme Court of Tennessee Blog (June 25, 2015)
  • "Supreme Court to Hear Insurance Subsidy Case This Week," Nashville Post (March 2, 2015)
  • "Attys Predict Supreme Court Will Uphold ACA’s Tax Credits," Law360 (March 2, 2015)
  • "ACA Faces Key Court Test Over Its Future," The Tennessean (December 28, 2014).
  • "A Reference Guide to the 'Halbig' Cases: Can the IRS Issue ACA Subsidies Through Federal Exchanges?" Forbes (December 2013)


Vanderbilt Law Review — Notes Editor

Nashville's Top 30 Under 30 — Honoree


Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.