Summary Judgment Obtained in Breach of Contract and Misappropriation of Trade Secrets Case

We obtained summary judgment on behalf of an individual client and her company in a breach of contract and misappropriation of trade secrets case arising under the Tennessee Uniform Trade Secrets Act. The individual and her company, which sells a cryosurgical medical product, were sued by the individual’s former employer for allegedly misappropriating the former employer’s customer information, quality information, product information, etc. The plaintiff argued that it became aware of this alleged misappropriation through means of an anonymous tip from a concerned customer or vendor. Defendants argued, and the court agreed, that the alleged tip constituted inadmissible hearsay and that there was insufficient evidence of a breach or misappropriation to survive summary judgment.

You Also May Be Interested In:

  • Represented Serco Inc. in its definitive Asset Purchase Agreement to acquire Alion Science & Technology Corporation’s Naval Systems Business Unit, including its Canadian business and a small number of related contract operations, for $225 million. The acquisition, subject to regulatory approvals, is expected to close in the second half of 2019.  Serco Inc., a provider of professional, technology, and management services, will strengthen its presence in naval support with this acquisition, and will become a stronger integrated maritime solutions provider for the U.S Navy and other customers.

    We represented Serco Inc. in its definitive Asset Purchase Agreement to acquire Alion Science & Technology Corporation's Naval Systems Business...
    Client Type: Private Company
  • We represented a government contractor in the defense of a discrimination charge brought by a former employee, filed with both the Florida Commission on Human Rights (FCHR) and the EEOC.  The FCHR issued a finding of no cause.

    We represented a government contractor in the defense of a discrimination charge brought by a former employee, filed with both...
    Client Type: Private Company
  • We represented a home improvement retailer in connection to a charge of discrimination and lawsuit filed by a former employee, alleging unlawful conduct on numerous theories.  After initial discovery, the charge and lawsuit were settled.

    We represented a home improvement retailer in connection to a charge of discrimination and lawsuit filed by a former employee,...
    Client Type: Public Company