Successful Representation of Trademark Protection for Restaurant Company

We successfully represented a national restaurant company in a lawsuit to protect the restaurant’s most important trademark, its name. A competitor of our client tried to launch a restaurant chain with a similar name to that of our client’s. We fought against the launch of the new restaurant based on trademark infringement and were successful in stopping the competitor.

You Also May Be Interested In:

  • Represented Genesco in its sale of Lids its hat-focused division

    We represented Genesco, Inc. (NYSE: GCO) in its sale of Lids Sports Group to FanzzLids Holdings in an all-cash transaction...
    Client Type: Public Company
  • Represent the Nashville Soccer Club on sponsorship, corporate, intellectual property, media and event license matters

    We represent the Nashville Soccer Club, which began playing USL matches in early 2018, on sponsorship, corporate, intellectual property, media...
    Client Type: Private Company
  • Represented Life Technologies Corp. in a Federal Circuit Appeal stemming from a 2017 Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) decision in a covered business method proceeding (CBM). Michael Kiklis represented Life Technologies in two covered business method proceedings: one was filed in 2014 and the other was filed in 2015. Life Technologies prevailed in both proceedings with the PTAB finding that all challenged claims of Unisone Strategic IP Inc.’s inventory management patent recited ineligible subject matter pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 101. This appeal involved the second CBM. Unisone chose not to appeal the first CBM. The Federal Circuit heard oral argument on December 4, 2018, and then affirmed the PTAB’s decision less than one week later.

    We represented Life Technologies Corp. in a Federal Circuit Appeal stemming from a 2017 Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)...
    Client Type: Private Company