Close X
Attorney Spotlight

Find out how Gardner Bell's experience promoting financial and economic development initiatives both locally and abroad informs his role as an attorney. Find out more>

Search

Close X

Experience

Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

On December 1, 2016, Parker Hannifin Corporation and CLARCOR Inc. announced that the companies have entered into a definitive agreement under which Parker will acquire CLARCOR for approximately $4.3 billion in cash, including the assumption of net debt. The transaction has been unanimously approved by the board of directors of each company. Upon closing of the transaction, expected to be completed by or during the first quarter of Parker’s fiscal year 2018, CLARCOR will be combined with Parker’s Filtration Group to form a leading and diverse global filtration business. Bass, Berry & Sims has served CLARCOR as primary corporate and securities counsel for 10 years and served as lead counsel on this transaction. Read more here.

CLARCOR
Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

Securities Law Exchange BlogSecurities Law Exchange blog offers insight on the latest legal and regulatory developments affecting publicly traded companies. It focuses on a wide variety of topics including regulation and reporting updates, public company advisory topics, IPO readiness and exchange updates including IPO announcements, M&A trends and deal news.

Read More >

Employers Cautioned to Review Disclosures for FCRA Compliance

Publications

March 18, 2014

Employers have long been under an obligation to provide employees and prospective employees with prior written notice that a credit report – a "consumer report" in the language of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) – may be obtained about them.  The FCRA specifically requires this notice to be "in a document that consists solely of the disclosure," although the Act elsewhere clarifies that the disclosure may also contain an authorization by the employee or applicant for procurement of the report.  Recent court decisions, settlements, and new lawsuits have highlighted the importance of ensuring compliance with this provision of the FCRA.

On December 2, 2013, a federal district court in Pennsylvania held that an employer violated the FCRA by combing the FCRA disclosure and authorization form with a waiver of rights related to the consumer report and background check.  After the court’s ruling, the company in that case, ClosetMaid, was forced to settle the lawsuit as a class action, agreeing to pay $400 to each of 1,540 class members who received the combined disclosure/waiver form – a total of more than $600,000 – plus the plaintiff attorney’s fees and the costs of administering the settlement.  There appears to be an upsurge in this type of litigation as class action lawsuits alleging similar claims have been filed in the last week against Publix Super Markets and UBS.

The remedial provisions of the FCRA are very favorable to plaintiffs.  They allow for class certification with no cap on class-wide damages, attorney fee-shifting, and statutory damages between $100 and $1,000 for each willful violation of the Act.  Employers who receive credit reports and conduct background checks on employees and prospective employees should carefully review their disclosures to ensure compliance with the FCRA.


Related Professionals

Related Services

Notice

Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.