We served as counsel to hospitals in a qui tam lawsuit alleging that cardiologist performed medically unnecessary cardiac stent procedures. Following declination, we obtained dismissal on grounds that the lawsuit was barred under the public disclosure bar. Following the Relator’s appeal, the Court of Appeals upheld the dismissal. U.S. ex rel. Maur v. Korban, 981 F.3d 516 (6th Cir. 2020).
U.S. ex rel. Maur v. Korban et al.
You Also May Be Interested In:
Representation of ED company and other defendants in qui tam lawsuit alleging that ED provider’s violation of licensure laws caused submission of false claims and that defendants fraudulently billed services as performed by physicians even though patients were seen only by nurse practitioners. We obtained dismissal of the licensure claims and received summary judgment as to the upcoding claims. U.S. ex rel. Taylor v. Boyko, 2020 WL 520933 (S.D. W. Va. Jan. 31, 2020); U.S. ex rel. Taylor v. Perni, 2020 WL 2499544 (S.D. W. Va. May 14, 2020).
Representation of Skilled Nursing Facility Company: U.S. ex rel. Wright v. Saber Healthcare Holdings (E.D. Va.)