We served as lead counsel representing a not-for-profit in-patient addiction treatment facility located in Brattleboro, Vermont, in a qui tam lawsuit alleging violations of the False Claims Act (FCA) based on allegations that the provider submitted false claims for reimbursement to state and federal payers and by using internal accounting codes to mask alleged overpayments. The district court granted the provider’s motion to dismiss, concluding that the relator failed to satisfy the pleading requirements of Rule 9(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and that certain of the relator’s claims were time-barred. This district court’s opinion is one of the few reported decisions in the District of Vermont considering the pleading requirements for FCA violations. Reported case: U.S. ex rel. Joseph v. Brattleboro Retreat, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110153 (D. Vt. Aug. 10, 2014).
Representation of In-Patient Addiction Treatment Facility: U.S. ex rel. Joseph v. Brattleboro Retreat (D. Vt.)
You Also May Be Interested In:
Lead counsel representing Northwest Medical Center (Tucson, Arizona) in FCA lawsuit alleging Northwest improperly billed Medicare for outpatient therapy services through failure to document exact number of minutes of therapy provided to patients. Federal district court dismissed case on grounds that the complaint did not satisfy the pleading requirements of Rule 9(b) or plead the underlying falsity of the claims at issue. U.S. ex rel. McFeeters v. Northwest Hospital, LLC, 2015 WL 328212 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 23, 2015)
Representation of Dialysis Supply Company: U.S. ex rel. Williams v. Renal Care Group, Inc. (M.D. Tenn./6th Cir.)
Representation of Renal Care Group, Inc., in FCA action involving billing for dialysis supplies, resulting in summary judgment entered on behalf of Renal Care and key Sixth Circuit opinion on FCA issues
Representation of Hospital Ownership Company: U.S. ex rel. Frazier v. IASIS Healthcare Corp. (D. Ariz.)
Representation of IASIS Healthcare Corporation and its hospitals in DOJ/HHS-OIG investigation into allegations of Anti-Kickback Statute, the Stark Law, and medical necessity of certain medical procedures, resulting in declination of intervention by the government and district court’s dismissal of action and sanctioning of relator’s counsel