Sixth Circuit Affirms Dismissal for Morgan Keegan & Co. in Case of First Impression

We represented Morgan Keegan & Co. in two cases brought by individual investors in certain Morgan Keegan Funds stemming from investment fund company losses in the wake of the global credit crisis. The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, in a case of first impression for it, ruled that the plaintiffs had waited too long to file suit and their claims were therefore barred by the three- and five-year statutes of repose under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, respectively. The decision contributed to a circuit split over the issue of whether a securities plaintiff can rely on a pending class action to toll a repose period, which recently came before the Supreme Court.

The cases are Stein v. Regions Morgan Keegan Select High Income Fund Inc. and Starnes v. Regions Morgan Keegan Select High Income Fund Inc., case numbers 15-5903 and 15-5905, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

The case was covered by various media outlets, including:

Morgan Keegan (formerly NYSE: MOR) was a national broker-dealer institution. In April 2012, Morgan Keegan & Co was acquired by Raymond James Financial.

You Also May Be Interested In:

  • We serve as lead counsel for the company and 23 individual defendants in a putative class action alleging violations of Sections 10(b), 10A and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Sections 11, 12 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933. The plaintiffs allege that defendants made materially false and misleading statements and omissions concerning the company’s contracts and its out-of-network billing. In re Envision Healthcare Corporation Securities Litigation, Civil Action No. 3:17-cv-01112 (M.D. Tenn.).

    We serve as lead counsel for the company and 23 individual defendants in a putative class action alleging violations of...
    Client Type: Private Company
  • Served as lead counsel for Morgan Keegan and related entities in Federal securities, ERISA and derivative multi-district litigation related to investment company losses in the wake of the credit crisis

    We served as lead counsel for Morgan Keegan and related entities in Federal securities, ERISA and derivative multi-district litigation related...
    Client Type: Public Company
  • We served as lead counsel for Envision Healthcare Corporation and current and former board members in four derivative actions asserting claims for breach of fiduciary duty, wasted corporate assets, unjust enrichment and violations of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 arising out of allegations of over billing and improperly billing medical patients, failing to supervise corporate action and failure to maintain proper internal controls.  These cases were consolidated in 2018.  Following a company merger, the case was dismissed in its entirety on October 25, 2018. Purrone v. Sanger et al., Case No. 3:17-cv-01472 (M.D. Tenn.).

    We served as lead counsel for Envision Healthcare Corporation and current and former board members in four derivative actions asserting...
    Client Type: Private Company