Sixth Circuit Affirms Dismissal for Morgan Keegan & Co. in Case of First Impression

We represented Morgan Keegan & Co. in two cases brought by individual investors in certain Morgan Keegan Funds stemming from investment fund company losses in the wake of the global credit crisis. The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, in a case of first impression for it, ruled that the plaintiffs had waited too long to file suit and their claims were therefore barred by the three- and five-year statutes of repose under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, respectively. The decision contributed to a circuit split over the issue of whether a securities plaintiff can rely on a pending class action to toll a repose period, which recently came before the Supreme Court.

The cases are Stein v. Regions Morgan Keegan Select High Income Fund Inc. and Starnes v. Regions Morgan Keegan Select High Income Fund Inc., case numbers 15-5903 and 15-5905, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

The case was covered by various media outlets, including:

Morgan Keegan (formerly NYSE: MOR) was a national broker-dealer institution. In April 2012, Morgan Keegan & Co was acquired by Raymond James Financial.

You Also May Be Interested In:

  • Successfully argued issue of first impression under the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

    We successfully argued issue of first impression under the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act before the U.S. Court of Appeals...
    Client Type: Public Company
  • Served as lead counsel for Morgan Keegan and related entities in Federal securities, ERISA and derivative multi-district litigation related to investment company losses in the wake of the credit crisis

    We served as lead counsel for Morgan Keegan and related entities in Federal securities, ERISA and derivative multi-district litigation related...
    Client Type: Public Company
  • Obtained summary judgment on behalf of Change Healthcare and related entities in federal court litigation in Seattle stemming from Change Healthcare’s acquisition of a start-up business in the healthcare technology industry where the stock purchase agreement had contingent earn-out provisions

    We obtained summary judgment on behalf of Change Healthcare and related entities in federal court litigation in Seattle stemming from...
    Client Type: Private Company