Representation of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring Company

We served as lead counsel representing the largest independent intraoperative neuromonitoring service provider in connection with a multi-year company-wide False Claims Act investigation by the Department of Justice (DOJ) concerning interpretation and application of CMS billing codes related to IONM services provided by the company. We negotiated a successful settlement on behalf of the company.

You Also May Be Interested In:

  • We represented a global for-profit health insurance company with more than 20 million members in False Claims Act (FCA) litigation in federal court in the Northern District of Illinois.

    We represented a global for-profit health insurance company with more than 20 million members in False Claims Act (FCA) litigation...
    Client Type: Private Company
  • Representation of ED company and other defendants in qui tam lawsuit alleging that ED provider’s violation of licensure laws caused submission of false claims and that defendants fraudulently billed services as performed by physicians even though patients were seen only by nurse practitioners. We obtained dismissal of the licensure claims and received summary judgment as to the upcoding claims. U.S. ex rel. Taylor v. Boyko, 2020 WL 520933 (S.D. W. Va. Jan. 31, 2020); U.S. ex rel. Taylor v. Perni, 2020 WL 2499544 (S.D. W. Va. May 14, 2020).

    We serve as lead counsel representing ED company and other defendants in qui tam lawsuit alleging that ED provider’s violation...
  • We served as lead counsel representing one the largest privately-held skilled nursing facility companies in the country in connection with...
    Client Type: Private Company