Raiding Case Before NASD Arbitration Panel Results in $6 Million Award

We represented Duncan-Williams, Inc. in a raiding case against Coastal Securities, Inc., in which our client alleged that Coastal and former Duncan-Williams employees conspired to misappropriate, copy and delete documents in a raid of the Duncan-Williams public finance department.  An NASD panel found in favor of Duncan-Williams and awarded the family-owned firm damages totaling more than $6 million, including $2.5 million in compensatory damages against both Coastal and Duncan-Williams’ former head of public finance, and $2 million in punitive damages assessed to Coastal alone.  Coastal and one of the employees it hired away from Duncan-Williams were also ordered to pay $370,000 in a return of the compensation paid to the individual by Duncan-Williams during the extended period he was alleged to have been conspiring with the Texas firm. Duncan-Williams, Inc. v. Coastal Securities, L.P. et al. (FINRA Case No. 02-01704)

Duncan-Williams is a privately owned investment banking firm headquartered in Memphis, TN.

You Also May Be Interested In:

  • Served as lead counsel for Morgan Keegan and related entities in Federal securities, ERISA and derivative multi-district litigation related to investment company losses in the wake of the credit crisis

    We served as lead counsel for Morgan Keegan and related entities in Federal securities, ERISA and derivative multi-district litigation related...
    Client Type: Public Company
  • Successful defense of LPL Financial in $5.8 million FINRA arbitration claim

    We successfully defended LPL Financial in a $5.8 million FINRA arbitration claim.  The claimants asserted that LPL improperly concentrated their...
    Client Type: Public Company
  • Successfully argued issue of first impression under the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

    We successfully argued issue of first impression under the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act before the U.S. Court of Appeals...
    Client Type: Public Company