We obtained summary judgment on behalf of a home improvement retailer in a sexual harassment case involving a current employee of the retailer. Plaintiff argued that the employer should be held liable for sexual harassment because the alleged harasser was not immediately suspended upon Plaintiff’s report of alleged harassment. Our client argued, and the Court agreed, that an employer is not required by law to automatically suspend an alleged harasser and, where an employer takes prompt, remedial action, as done in this case, liability does not exist.
Defense of Home Improvement Retailer in Sexual Harassment Case
You Also May Be Interested In:
We represented a government contractor in the defense of a discrimination charge brought by a former employee, filed with both the Florida Commission on Human Rights (FCHR) and the EEOC. The FCHR issued a finding of no cause.
We represented a home improvement retailer in connection to a charge of discrimination and lawsuit filed by a former employee, alleging unlawful conduct on numerous theories. After initial discovery, the charge and lawsuit were settled.
We represented an industrial technology company in the settlement of allegations by a former employee of wrongful discharge based on numerous theories in which our client faced substantial exposure.