Close X
Attorney Spotlight

Find out which two countries Cheryl Palmeri gets the most questions about related to International Trade in today's market? Find out more>


Close X


Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

In June 2016, AmSurg Corp. and Envision Healthcare Holdings, Inc. (Envision) announced they have signed a definitive merger agreement pursuant to which the companies will combine in an all-stock transaction. Upon completion of the merger, which is expected to be tax-free to the shareholders of both organizations, the combined company will be named Envision Healthcare Corporation and co-headquartered in Nashville, Tennessee and Greenwood Village, Colorado. The company's common stock is expected to trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol: EVHC. Bass, Berry & Sims served as lead counsel on the transaction, led by Jim Jenkins. Read more.

AmSurg logo

Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

Inside the FCA blogInside the FCA blog features ongoing updates related to the False Claims Act (FCA), including insight on the latest legal decisions, regulatory developments and FCA settlements. The blog provides timely updates for corporate boards, directors, compliance managers, general counsel and other parties interested in the organizational impact and legal developments stemming from issues potentially giving rise to FCA liability.

Read More >

CFPB Warns Furnishers of Consumer Data


September 6, 2013

Earlier this week, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) reminded entities that furnish information to consumer reporting agencies (CRAs) about their obligation to investigate consumer disputes. The Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) requires CRAs to notify the furnisher when a consumer disputes the accuracy of information that was provided by the furnisher to the CRA. That notification must include "all relevant information" provided by the consumer in support of the dispute. In turn, the FCRA requires the furnisher to conduct an investigation of the dispute; report the results to the CRA; and, if the furnished information was inaccurate, provide corrected information to every CRA that received the inaccurate information.

The thrust of the CFPB bulletin appears to be recent updates to e-OSCAR – the system used by the three largest credit bureaus to communicate with furnishers about credit disputes. In December 2012, the CFPB issued a report which highlighted that e-OSCAR did not allow CRAs to provide furnishers with documents submitted by consumers in support of their disputes. The credit bureaus recently have upgraded e-OSCAR so that it is now capable of sending furnishers documents provided by consumers. The only novel guidance in the bulletin issued by the CFPB this week is the advice that each furnisher maintain a system capable of receiving information provided by CRAs regarding disputes, "including supporting documentation."

Companies that provide consumer information to CRAs should ensure that their systems are compliant with the newly upgraded e-OSCAR functionality. Furnishers of consumer information also should ensure that their dispute resolution procedures take into account the documentation that previously was unavailable through e-OSCAR. Finally, in addition to their obligation to investigate disputes transmitted from CRAs, furnishers are reminded that the FCRA also requires furnishers to maintain written policies and procedures to investigate disputes received directly from consumers. The CFPB bulletin demonstrates the renewed focus that the federal regulators – the CFPB and Federal Trade Commission – have placed on FCRA compliance by furnishers and all other entities subject to the Act.

If you have any questions about the content of this alert, please contact the author listed above or any of the FCRA team members listed here.

Related Professionals

Related Services


Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.