Close X

Attorney Spotlight

How does Eli Richardson's past work with the federal government inform his client interactions? Find out more>

Search

Close X

Experience

Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

In June 2016, AmSurg Corp. and Envision Healthcare Holdings, Inc. (Envision) announced they have signed a definitive merger agreement pursuant to which the companies will combine in an all-stock transaction. Upon completion of the merger, which is expected to be tax-free to the shareholders of both organizations, the combined company will be named Envision Healthcare Corporation and co-headquartered in Nashville, Tennessee and Greenwood Village, Colorado. The company's common stock is expected to trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol: EVHC. Bass, Berry & Sims served as lead counsel on the transaction, led by Jim Jenkins. Read more.

AmSurg logo


Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

Inside the FCA blogInside the FCA blog features ongoing updates related to the False Claims Act (FCA), including insight on the latest legal decisions, regulatory developments and FCA settlements. The blog provides timely updates for corporate boards, directors, compliance managers, general counsel and other parties interested in the organizational impact and legal developments stemming from issues potentially giving rise to FCA liability.

Read More >

Labor Talk Blog: Supreme Court Grants Review in NLRB Recess Appointments Case

Publications

July 2, 2013

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to review whether the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") has a sufficient number of members to issue rulings. The Supreme Court will review the decision of the District of Columbia Circuit in NLRB v. Noel Canning Div. of Noel Corp.. There, the D.C. Circuit ruled that the NLRB lacked the necessary three-member quorum to decide an unfair labor practice case. The D.C. Circuit determined that President Obama's recess appointments of two of the three members of the NLRB panel occurred when there was not a true "recess," making the appointments unconstitutional. The decision has the potential to impact hundreds of NLRB decisions dating back to at least January 2012 as well as the NLRB's recent expedited election rulemaking discussed in more detail below.

In its appeal of an unfair labor practices decision by the NLRB, Noel Canning argued that the NLRB did not have the requisite quorum to act because the President's recess appointments of two of the three panel members who decided the case, Sharon Block and Terence Flynn, were invalid. The Recess Appointments Clause of the U.S. Constitution provides, "The President shall have the Power to fill up all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session." Block and Flynn were appointed while the U.S. Senate was holding "pro forma" sessions every three days in an effort to prevent recess appointments. The D.C. Circuit interpreted the Recess Appointments Clause to require that recess appointments be made during intersession breaks—i.e., breaks that happen between enumerated sessions of Congress not intrasession breaks that happen during a particular session—for vacancies that arise during the recess. Consequently, the court invalidated the appointments of Block and Flynn.

The U.S. Supreme Court granted review of three issues:

  1. Whether the President's recess-appointment powers may be exercised during a recess that occurs within a session of the Senate, or is instead limited to recesses that occur between enumerated sessions of the Senate.
  2. Whether the President's recess-appointment power may be exercised to fill vacancies that exist during a recess, or is instead limited to vacancies that first arose during that recess.
  3. Whether the President's recess-appointment power may be exercised when the Senate is convening every three days in pro forma sessions.

We expect a decision in this case in mid-2014. If the justices side with the D.C. Circuit, the ruling would call into question all NLRB action taken since at least January 2012, when Block and Flynn were appointed, including but not limited to the NLRB's recent decisions regarding an employer's duty to bargain with unions over significant employee discipline, an employer's duty to deduct dues from employees' paychecks, "courtesy" policies, and class action waivers in arbitration agreements.


In Case You Missed It:

Related Professionals

Related Services

Notice

Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.