Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement in Favor of AutoZone

We represented AutoZone in a patent infringement case and were granted summary judgment of non-infringement. EMG Technology filed suit claiming that AutoZone’s website infringed upon the company’s patented system for creating sister websites, specifically referring to AutoZone’s reformatting of its main site to a mobile version. U.S. District Judge Michael H. Schneider of the U.S. District Court in the Eastern District of Texas granted summary judgment of non-infringement, finding no issue of material fact that AutoZone’s websites did not infringe the patent because the company’s main site is in XHTML and its mobile site uses the HTML-serialization of HTML5, whereas the patent requires conversion from HTML to XML to create a sister site. The court thus found that AutoZone did not infringe the patent literally or under the doctrine of equivalents.

AutoZone, Inc. (NYSE: AZO) is the leading retailer and a leading distributor of automotive replacement parts and accessories in the U.S.

You Also May Be Interested In:

  • We represented nutritional supplement manufacturing company, Natural Alternatives International, Inc. (Nasdaq: NAII), in a Federal Circuit Court of Appeals case in which our client had brought claims against rival Creative Compounds LLC, accusing Creative Compounds of infringing six of its patents covering various forms of beta-alanine and its use as a muscle-building supplement.  The Southern District of California had dismissed the suit, finding the patent claims to be directed toward a product of nature (beta-alanine) and a law of nature (that taking beta-alanine in sufficient quantities builds muscle) and thus patent-ineligible.  On appeal, a split panel sided with our client, finding the district court applied too broadly the ineligibility doctrine of the “Alice/Mayo test” and that, although beta-alanine itself can occur as a natural substance, the claims containing beta-alanine as one aspect covered more than an unpatentable natural law.

    Law360 provided analysis of the case in the article “Fed. Circ. Clarifies Alice In Reviving Supplement Co.’s IP Suit,” published on March 15, 2019.

    We represented nutritional supplement manufacturing company, Natural Alternatives International, Inc. (Nasdaq: NAII), in a Federal Circuit Court of Appeals case...
    Client Type: Public Company
  • Represented Genesco in its sale of Lids its hat-focused division

    We represented Genesco, Inc. (NYSE: GCO) in its sale of Lids Sports Group to FanzzLids Holdings in an all-cash transaction...
    Client Type: Public Company
  • Represent the Nashville Soccer Club on sponsorship, corporate, intellectual property, media and event license matters

    We represent the Nashville Soccer Club, which began playing USL matches in early 2018, on sponsorship, corporate, intellectual property, media...
    Client Type: Private Company