Summary Judgment for HTMS in Fraud Case

We represented HealthTech Management Services, Inc. (HTMS) in exercising its rights as a victim under the federal Crime Victims Rights Acts in a federal criminal prosecution and in litigating a related civil lawsuit. HTMS had been victimized when one of its employees, Paul Cardwell, together with co-conspirator Michael Plake, defrauded a client of HTMS out of more than $847,000. We led the internal investigation by HTMS, disclosed the crime to federal law-enforcement, liaised with federal law-enforcement throughout the resulting criminal prosecution of Cardwell and Plake, and conducted related federal civil litigation that resulted in summary judgment against Cardwell and his co-conspirator and ultimately judgments of $3.5 million and $2 million against Cardwell and Plake, respectively.

HealthTech Management Services® works with critical access, district and acute care hospitals across the U.S. to help them improve financial strength, build professional excellence and grow to meet the needs of their community.

You Also May Be Interested In:

  • We successfully defended a national home healthcare provider in appealing an $18 million extrapolated overpayment resulting from a UPIC audit.

    We successfully defended a national home healthcare provider in appealing an $18 million extrapolated overpayment resulting from a UPIC audit....
    Client Type: Public Company
  • We represented a global for-profit health insurance company with more than 20 million members in False Claims Act (FCA) litigation in federal court in the Northern District of Illinois.

    We represented a global for-profit health insurance company with more than 20 million members in False Claims Act (FCA) litigation...
    Client Type: Private Company
  • Representation of ED company and other defendants in qui tam lawsuit alleging that ED provider’s violation of licensure laws caused submission of false claims and that defendants fraudulently billed services as performed by physicians even though patients were seen only by nurse practitioners. We obtained dismissal of the licensure claims and received summary judgment as to the upcoding claims. U.S. ex rel. Taylor v. Boyko, 2020 WL 520933 (S.D. W. Va. Jan. 31, 2020); U.S. ex rel. Taylor v. Perni, 2020 WL 2499544 (S.D. W. Va. May 14, 2020).

    We serve as lead counsel representing ED company and other defendants in qui tam lawsuit alleging that ED provider’s violation...