Close X
Attorney Spotlight

Find out which two countries Cheryl Palmeri gets the most questions about related to International Trade in today's market? Find out more>


Close X


Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

In June 2016, AmSurg Corp. and Envision Healthcare Holdings, Inc. (Envision) announced they have signed a definitive merger agreement pursuant to which the companies will combine in an all-stock transaction. Upon completion of the merger, which is expected to be tax-free to the shareholders of both organizations, the combined company will be named Envision Healthcare Corporation and co-headquartered in Nashville, Tennessee and Greenwood Village, Colorado. The company's common stock is expected to trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol: EVHC. Bass, Berry & Sims served as lead counsel on the transaction, led by Jim Jenkins. Read more.

AmSurg logo

Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

Inside the FCA blogInside the FCA blog features ongoing updates related to the False Claims Act (FCA), including insight on the latest legal decisions, regulatory developments and FCA settlements. The blog provides timely updates for corporate boards, directors, compliance managers, general counsel and other parties interested in the organizational impact and legal developments stemming from issues potentially giving rise to FCA liability.

Read More >

FCC Enters Data Security Arena, Ups the Ante in Federal Enforcement


October 30, 2014

For the first time, on October 24, the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") took action in the area of data security regulation, which until now primarily has been within the domain of the Federal Trade Commission. In an unprecedented move, the FCC announced $10 million in fines against two telecommunications companies, TerraCom, Inc. and YourTel America, Inc., pursuant to the Communications Act, for allegedly failing to safeguard sensitive personal information of their customers.

According to the FCC investigation, the phone carriers apparently stored customer Social Security numbers, names, addresses, driver's licenses, and other sensitive information in a format accessible via the Internet, readable by anyone. The data, collected to prove eligibility for the government's subsidy program for low-income individuals, should have been destroyed after the eligibility process was complete, or stored in a secure manner. Instead, the FCC contends the companies exposed the personal information of up to 300,000 low-income consumers to public view. The FCC claims that the companies compounded the problem by allegedly failing to notify all potentially-affected consumers after the data security breach was discovered.

While it is unclear the extent to which the FCC intends to focus on data privacy, its recent action signals the increasing importance of data security and sends a strong message to custodians of personal information about their obligation to protect such information. In particular, entities regulated by the Communications Act have a duty to reasonably secure the personal information of customers, and the FCC may hold those entities accountable for failure to do so.

Businesses that collect, store, or maintain any personal identifying information should have compliance programs in place to ensure adequate protection of that data, and should follow appropriate response measures when a data breach occurs. Our experienced data security team offers compliance counseling, together with time-critical breach response assistance.

Related Professionals

Related Services


Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.