Close X
Attorney Spotlight

What is Shannon Wiley looking forward to at this year's Asembia Specialty Pharmacy Summit? Find out more>


Close X


Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

Primary Care Providers Win Challenge of CMS Interpretation of Enhanced Payment Law

With the help and support of the Tennessee Medical Association, 21 Tennessee physicians of underserved communities joined together and retained Bass, Berry & Sims to file suit against the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to stop improper collection efforts. Our team, led by David King, was successful in halting efforts to recoup TennCare payments that were used legitimately to expand services in communities that needed them. Read more

Tennessee Medical Association & Bass, Berry & Sims

Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

Download the Healthcare Fraud & Abuse Review 2017, authored by Bass, Berry & Sims

The Healthcare Fraud & Abuse Review 2017 details all healthcare-related False Claims Act settlements from last year, organized by particular sectors of the healthcare industry. In addition to reviewing all healthcare fraud-related settlements, the Review includes updates on enforcement-related litigation involving the Stark Law and Anti-Kickback Statute, and looks at the continued implications from the government's focus on enforcement efforts involving individual actors in connection with civil and criminal healthcare fraud investigations.

Click here to download the Review.

Successful Defense of Small Business Award

Client Type: Private Company

We represented Summit2Sea Consulting, an inventor specializing in computer software development, as an intervenor in a GAO protest. Summit2Sea was recently awarded a task order worth nearly $29 million through the company's Federal Supply Schedule contract. A disappointed offeror protested to GAO the award to Summit2Sea, making several arguments about the procuring agency's (DARPA) evaluation of both its quotation and Summit2Sea's quotation. 

The protester first challenged the evaluation of its technical experience, arguing that where the solicitation required offerors to demonstrate experience, expertise, and understanding of the requirement, the agency improperly downgraded its quotation for lack of detail of its approach to meeting the requirement. The protester argued that this constituted an unstated evaluation criterion. The agency adeptly defended its evaluation, with Summit2Sea filing several responses in support of the agency's position. GAO ultimately found that an offeror's demonstration of its understanding of the solicitation requirements logically includes details of the actions and approaches it intends to use to meet those requirements. Thus, the agency's position was upheld, and the protester's argument regarding unstated evaluation criteria failed.

The protester also challenged the agency's evaluation of elements of Summit2Sea’s quotation. Working with the agency in response to this protest ground, the Bass Berry GovCon team successfully argued to GAO that because the protester was not next in line for award, it lacked standing as an "interested party" to challenge the agency's evaluation of Summit2Sea's proposal. There was another offeror ranked ahead of the protester and behind Summit2Sea, making it next in line for award. The protester failed to challenge the other offeror's position as second ranked, thus, GAO agreed with the agency and Summit2Sea that even if the protester was correct in its challenge to Summit2Sea’s proposal, it still would not have received the award. As a result, GAO dismissed the portion of the protest relating to the evaluation of Summit2Sea's proposal.

As for the protester's challenge to the source selection decision, the agency and the GovCon team successfully demonstrated that the technical superiority of Summit2Sea's proposal was reasonable and consistent with the solicitation's stated evaluation criteria, making the award to Summit2Sea proper. GAO agreed, and denied the remaining portion of the protest. Ultimately, the award to Summit2Sea was upheld and it is now in the process of transitioning into performance under the contract.

You Also May Be Interested In:

Related Professionals

Related Services


Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.