We represented a tissue manufacturer in connection with an arbitration with an engineer/construction manager concerning claims between the parties regarding a project to add a state of the art tissue machine to an existing paper plant. The matter was resolved through a mediation.
Representation of Tissue Manufacturer in Arbitration with Engineer/Construction Manager
You Also May Be Interested In:
Successfully represented AmSurg Holdings, Inc. in a dispute with a group of physicians seeking to invalidate a non-compete provision that was a material feature of a highly profitable surgery center partnership located in Minnesota
We serve as lead counsel for the company and 23 individual defendants in a putative class action alleging violations of Sections 10(b), 10A and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Sections 11, 12 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933. The plaintiffs allege that defendants made materially false and misleading statements and omissions concerning the company’s contracts and its out-of-network billing. In re Envision Healthcare Corporation Securities Litigation, Civil Action No. 3:17-cv-01112 (M.D. Tenn.).