We represented an electrical subcontractor in a multi-party arbitration involving numerous claims by the owner, design/builder, a mechanical subcontractor and our client concerning the design and construction of a $200M washing machine plant. The matter was settled in a mediation.
Representation of Electrical Subcontractor in Arbitration Concerning Washing Machine Plant
You Also May Be Interested In:
Successfully represented AmSurg Holdings, Inc. in a dispute with a group of physicians seeking to invalidate a non-compete provision that was a material feature of a highly profitable surgery center partnership located in Minnesota
We serve as lead counsel for the company and 23 individual defendants in a putative class action alleging violations of Sections 10(b), 10A and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Sections 11, 12 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933. The plaintiffs allege that defendants made materially false and misleading statements and omissions concerning the company’s contracts and its out-of-network billing. In re Envision Healthcare Corporation Securities Litigation, Civil Action No. 3:17-cv-01112 (M.D. Tenn.).