Close X
Attorney Spotlight

How did a clerkship with Judge Merritt change the way Chris Climo approaches the practice of law? Find out more>


Close X


Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

Primary Care Providers Win Challenge of CMS Interpretation of Enhanced Payment Law

With the help and support of the Tennessee Medical Association, 21 Tennessee physicians of underserved communities joined together and retained Bass, Berry & Sims to file suit against the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to stop improper collection efforts. Our team, led by David King, was successful in halting efforts to recoup TennCare payments that were used legitimately to expand services in communities that needed them. Read more

Tennessee Medical Association & Bass, Berry & Sims

Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

Download the Healthcare Fraud & Abuse Review 2017, authored by Bass, Berry & Sims

The Healthcare Fraud & Abuse Review 2017 details all healthcare-related False Claims Act settlements from last year, organized by particular sectors of the healthcare industry. In addition to reviewing all healthcare fraud-related settlements, the Review includes updates on enforcement-related litigation involving the Stark Law and Anti-Kickback Statute, and looks at the continued implications from the government's focus on enforcement efforts involving individual actors in connection with civil and criminal healthcare fraud investigations.

Click here to download the Review.

Chris Lazarini Analyzes Enforceability of Arbitration Agreement in Employee Handbook

Securities Online Litigation Alert


January 8, 2018

Bass, Berry & Sims attorney Chris Lazarini analyzed a court's decision finding an arbitration agreement is valid and enforceable even when located in an employee handbook containing a general disclaimer that the handbook is not a contract of employment, where the arbitration agreement is distinct and mandatory and where the employee is advised that compliance with it is a condition of employment or continued employment.

Chris provided the analysis for Securities Online Litigation Alert (SOLA). The full text of the analysis is below and used with permission from the publication. If you would like to receive additional content from the SOLA, please visit the SOLA website to sign up for the newsletter.

Ngo vs. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc., No. 1:17-cv-1727 (S.D. N.Y., 11/30/17) 

An Arbitration Agreement is valid and enforceable even when located in an Employee Handbook containing a general disclaimer that the Handbook is not a contract of employment, where the Arbitration Agreement is distinct and mandatory and where the employee is advised that compliance with it is a condition of employment or continued employment. 

After working for Oppenheimer for several years, Plaintiff took parental leave in June 2014. While out, Plaintiff suffered a brain aneurysm, extended his leave and finally returned to work in November 2014. Around this time, Oppenheimer revised its employee handbook. The handbook contained an Arbitration Agreement and stated that it was not a contract of employment. Plaintiff acknowledged receipt of the handbook and electronically affirmed his agreement to abide by the Arbitration Agreement. After reducing Plaintiff's responsibilities and cutting his bonuses, Oppenheimer terminated Plaintiff in June 2016. Plaintiff filed this suit alleging that he was terminated in retaliation for taking paternal and medical leave. Before the Court is Oppenheimer's motion to dismiss or stay the action and to compel arbitration.

The Court considers whether the Arbitration Agreement is valid and enforceable and, if so, whether the action should be dismissed or stayed. It has no trouble finding that the parties agreed to arbitrate because the Agreement stated that it must be signed as a condition of Plaintiff's continued employment, it was in fact signed and Plaintiff was employed for almost two more years. Plaintiff challenged the enforceability of the Agreement, however, relying on the handbook's disclaimer that it was not a contract of employment. The Court disagrees, referencing the distinct formatting of the Arbitration Agreement within the handbook, the clear and binding nature of its language and Plaintiff's separate electronic acknowledgement of his agreement to be bound by it. Its remedy is to stay the action pending resolution of the arbitration proceeding. Had Oppenheimer wished for dismissal, the Court states, it might have requested that relief alone, but the text, structure and policy of the FAA require a stay if one is requested in the alternative or otherwise.

Related Professionals

Related Services


Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.