Close X
Attorney Spotlight

How did a clerkship with Judge Merritt change the way Chris Climo approaches the practice of law? Find out more>


Close X


Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

Primary Care Providers Win Challenge of CMS Interpretation of Enhanced Payment Law

With the help and support of the Tennessee Medical Association, 21 Tennessee physicians of underserved communities joined together and retained Bass, Berry & Sims to file suit against the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to stop improper collection efforts. Our team, led by David King, was successful in halting efforts to recoup TennCare payments that were used legitimately to expand services in communities that needed them. Read more

Tennessee Medical Association & Bass, Berry & Sims

Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

Download the Healthcare Fraud & Abuse Review 2017, authored by Bass, Berry & Sims

The Healthcare Fraud & Abuse Review 2017 details all healthcare-related False Claims Act settlements from last year, organized by particular sectors of the healthcare industry. In addition to reviewing all healthcare fraud-related settlements, the Review includes updates on enforcement-related litigation involving the Stark Law and Anti-Kickback Statute, and looks at the continued implications from the government's focus on enforcement efforts involving individual actors in connection with civil and criminal healthcare fraud investigations.

Click here to download the Review.

Richard Arnholt and Sylvia Yi Examine 2018 Changes in Challenges to Bid Protests from NDAA

National Defense Magazine


March 12, 2018

In an article published by National Defense Magazine, Bass, Berry & Sims attorneys Richard Arnholt and Sylvia Yi provided insight on the significant changes affecting defense contractors from the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for fiscal year 2018, specifically concerning bid protests.

There are two significant big protest changes in the new NDAA:

  1. the introduction of a new three-year pilot program in which large defense contractors will be required to pay the Department of Defense's costs where a protest is denied by the Government Accountability Office (GAO); and 
  2. the enhancement of post-award debriefing rights.

"While Congress passed the former with the intent of reducing frivolous protests, it is likely the latter – which will give contractors greater insight into the rationale behind procurement decisions – that will have greater impact on the number of protests filed," the authors wrote. 

The loser-pays provision is limited to protests by "large contractors" – defined to be revenues in excess of $250 million – that are "denied in an opinion" by GAO, thus meaning it will most likely only apply to a small number of protests and will not have Congress' desired effect of limiting frivolous protests. The pilot program is scheduled to go into effect on October 1, 2019. 

The second significant change to the NDAA is implementing Section 818, which builds on an existing Air Force program that gave unsuccessful offerors an opportunity to request an "extended debriefing." This allows an unsuccessful offeror's outside counsel to review the agency's redacted source selection documents and ask questions. The NDAA will expand this program for "extended debriefings" by requiring a revision of the DoD acquisition regulations to apply the extended debriefing requirements across the department. 

There are three significant enhancements to this program under the NDAA. "First, contractors are entitled to a debriefing for all contracts and task orders valued at $10 million or higher. Second, the agency is required to disclose its redacted source selection for contracts in excess of $100 million. Third, contractors are provided an opportunity to ask follow-up questions after a debriefing," Richard and Sylvia explained . A proposed rule implementing these changes is due in March, and Congress gave a deadline of six months from the date of enactment to implement all the changes. 

"The ultimate impact of these changes will depend on the regulations issued to implement the NDAA provisions, so contractors should carefully monitor developments over the coming year."

The full article, "Contractors Face Changes to Bid Protest Strategies," was published on March 6, 2018, by National Defense Magazine and is available online.

Related Professionals

Related Services


Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.