Close X
Attorney Spotlight

How did Mike DeAgro's experience co-founding a nonprofit advocacy organization lead to a career in the legal field? Find out more>


Close X


Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

Envision to Sell to KKR for $9.9 Billion

We represented Envision Healthcare Corporation (NYSE: EVHC) in its definitive agreement to sell to KKR in an all-cash transaction for $9.9 billion, including debt. KKR will pay $46 per Envision share in cash to buy the company, marking a 32 percent premium to the company's volume-weighted average share price from November 1, when Envision announced it was considering its options. The transaction is expected to close the fourth quarter of 2018. Read more

Envision Healthcare

Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

Six Things to Know Before Buying a Physician Practice spotlight

Dermatology, ophthalmology, radiology, urology…the list goes on. Yet, in any physician practice management transaction, there are six key considerations that apply and, if not carefully managed, can derail a transaction. Download the 6 Things to Know Before Buying a Physician Practice to keep your physician practice management transactions on track.

Click here to download the guide.

Complex Litigation Approach to Alternative Fee Arrangements

The Corporate Counselor


October 10, 2017

Overton Thompson | David Rue | Alternative Fee Arrangements in Complex LitigationIndividuals from Bass, Berry & Sims authored an article published in the October issue of The Corporate Counselor providing insight on alternative fee arrangements (AFAs) in complex litigation. The article was co-authored by Bass, Berry & Sims litigation member Overton Thompson and the firm's managing director of strategic pricing and client value David Rue. 

As introduced in the article, legal departments are increasingly pressured to bring value to their companies and when hiring outside counsel, clients are not looking for hours, they seek value. Therefore, it's important for legal departments to consider the available AFAs when outsourcing complex litigation matters. 

There are a number of benefits AFAs bring for both legal departments and the law firms they hire. One is that they drive improved communication and higher levels of client satisfaction – leading to a better attorney-client relationship. Additionally, AFAs lead to more predictable fees than straight hourly billing. 

For a complex defense case, there are a number of different AFAs that can be used, including blended rate arrangements, fixed fees, collar arrangements and pure contingency. These types of arrangements have their pros and cons, however, there is another arrangement that works particularly well in defending complex litigation called a "holdback arrangement." With a holdback arrangement, an agreed upon percentage of fees generated within a budget is set aside to create a pool of fees which can be used to encourage ideal outcomes. These arrangements incentivize results, efficiency and predictability.

"A holdback arrangement would work particularly well in the following scenario: a dispute involving a post-closing consideration in a purchase transaction. The seller sues a company (the outside firm's client) demanding damages for failure to pay certain earn-out payments allegedly owing under the purchase agreement, despite seller having failed to satisfy the conditions necessary to receive the payment. The amount at stake is relatively modest and can’t sustain an unbridled approach to defending the case."

The full article, "Alternative Fee Arrangements in Complex Litigation," was published online and in the October 2017 issue of The Corporate Counselor and is available in the PDF below.

Download Document - The Corporate Counselor - Alternative Fee Arrangements article (October 2017)

In Case You Missed It:

Related Professionals

Related Services


Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.