Close X
Attorney Spotlight

How did an interest in healthcare policy lead Robert Platt to a career in the law? Find out more>

Search

Close X

Experience

Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

Primary Care Providers Win Challenge of CMS Interpretation of Enhanced Payment Law

With the help and support of the Tennessee Medical Association, 21 Tennessee physicians of underserved communities joined together and retained Bass, Berry & Sims to file suit against the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to stop improper collection efforts. Our team, led by David King, was successful in halting efforts to recoup TennCare payments that were used legitimately to expand services in communities that needed them. Read more

Tennessee Medical Association & Bass, Berry & Sims

Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

GDPR Top 5 Actions You Should Take Now

The EU's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) went into effect on May 25th. As most organizations are aware, the GDPR applies not only to EU businesses but also many companies in the U.S. While the deadline is quickly approaching, most organizations are still grappling with the implications of the regulation on their business. Even if your readiness efforts are behind the curve, the GDPR Top 5 Actions You Should Take NOW will help you begin your efforts towards compliance and help mitigate your organization's risk in the short-term.

Click here to download the checklist.

President Signs Law Overriding FCC Rules Regarding Online Privacy

Firm Publication

Publications

April 7, 2017

On April 3, 2017, the President signed into law a joint resolution that eliminates rules submitted by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) that would have required Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to get approval from their customers before selling any information about the customer's online activity. The resolution narrowly passed in the U.S. House of Representatives and the Senate before being presented to the President for signature.

Many opponents of the now rejected rules argue they would have stifled innovation and limited the ability of ISPs to compete with companies that do collect usage data like Google and Facebook. While such companies can only collect data from usage of a specific website, rule supporters have expressed concerns that ISPs will be able to track their customers' entire browsing history because ISPs have much broader access to an individual's online activity. Advertisers purchasing that history could then build individual marketing profiles enabling them to target ads at people in specific demographic groups based on these profiles. Because the rules had yet to take effect, the repeal does not change what ISPs already may do with their customers' information; however, the repeal leaves open the question of how to interpret existing laws regulating the selling of customer information.

In 2015, the FCC classified broadband ISPs as "common carriers," subjecting broadband ISPs to Section 222 of the Communications Act of 1996 and exempting them from oversight by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). Section 222 allows broadband ISPs to collect and sell customers' aggregated data to third parties, but still mandates that broadband ISPs protect the confidentiality of their customers unless they receive approval to disclose and sell a customer's personal information. The now rejected rules would have clarified what type of "approval" is required for a broadband ISP to disclose and sell customers' personal information. Absent the rules, it is unclear whether simply offering an opportunity for customers to opt-out or providing notice in a privacy statement constitutes "approval." FCC Chairman Ajit Pai has vowed to work with the FTC to develop and enforce new, uniform privacy requirements equally applicable to all companies in the internet ecosystem.

Many of the major ISPs have agreed to follow a voluntary set of privacy principles based on the FTC's existing framework, specifically to: (1) allow for opt-in consent for the use and sharing of sensitive information as defined by the FTC; (2) offer an opt-out choice for the use of non-sensitive information for personalized marketing; and (3) rely on implied consent to use consumer information for certain activities, such as service fulfillment, market research, first-party marketing, and network management. Information related to a customer's browsing history or online activities would fall under the opt-out system.

The creation and adoption of new privacy rules is uncertain given that the FCC's proposed rules were repealed pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (CRA), which allows Congress to overturn recently adopted agency rules and prohibits agencies from adopting substantially similar rules in the future. The term "substantially similar" is not defined in the CRA and has yet to be interpreted by the courts. It is therefore uncertain whether the FCC could adopt new privacy rules.

Bass, Berry & Sims will continue to monitor and provide updates as we track privacy legislation and regulations. If you have questions regarding the potential effects of this legislation or any other privacy concerns relating to your organization, please contact an attorney on our Privacy & Data Security team.


Related Professionals

Related Services

Notice

Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.