Close X
Attorney Spotlight

How does Jordana Nelson's prior experience as a general counsel inform her work with firm clients? Read more>

Search

Close X

Experience

Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

The M&A Advisor Winner 2017The M&A Advisor announced the winners of the 16th Annual M&A Advisor Awards on Monday, November 13 at the 2017 M&A Advisor Awards. Bass, Berry & Sims was named a winner in the two categories related to the following deals:

M&A Deal of the Year (from $1B-$5B) – Acquisition of CLARCOR Inc. by Parker Hannifin Corporation

Corporate/Strategic Deal of the Year (over $1B) – Acquisition of BNC Bancorp by Pinnacle Financial Partners

Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

Regulation A+

It seems that lately there has been a noticeable uptick in Regulation A+ activity, including several recent Reg A+ securities offerings where the stock now successfully trades on national exchanges. In light of this activity, we have published a set of FAQs about Regulation A+ securities offerings to help companies better understand this "mini-IPO" offering process, as well as pros and cons compared to a traditional underwritten IPO.

Read now

Courtney Grande Outlines DOJ $23 Million Settlement Related to Cardiac Devices

ABA Health Law Section

Publications

August 3, 2016

Bass, Berry & Sims attorney Courtney Grande authored an article for the American Bar Association's (ABA) Health Law Section outlining the February 2016 settlement between the U.S. government and 51 hospitals related to the improper implantation of cardiac devices. Under the terms of the settlement, hospitals must pay $23 million to settle the allegations they inappropriately billed Medicare for improperly implanting cardiac devices from 2002-2010. As Courtney states in the article, the "case is especially notable because it shows the dilemma faced by healthcare companies who misinterpret Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' (CMS) regulations and fail to recognize when CMS's assessment of appropriate care differs from the medical community's definition." This case serves to remind healthcare providers "to assess whether their practices comply with federal regulations, particularly as medical treatments continue to advance at a faster pace than CMS regulations."

The full article, "The New Cardiac Device Settlements: Why is it not Just the Number of Defendants that Makes this Case Notable," was published by the ABA's Health Law Section and is available online.


Related Services

Notice

Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.