Close X
Attorney Spotlight

What colorful method does Claire Miley use to keep up with the latest healthcare regulations as they relate to proposed transactions? Find out more>

Search

Close X

Experience

Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

On December 1, 2016, Parker Hannifin Corporation and CLARCOR Inc. announced that the companies have entered into a definitive agreement under which Parker will acquire CLARCOR for approximately $4.3 billion in cash, including the assumption of net debt. The transaction has been unanimously approved by the board of directors of each company. Upon closing of the transaction, expected to be completed by or during the first quarter of Parker’s fiscal year 2018, CLARCOR will be combined with Parker’s Filtration Group to form a leading and diverse global filtration business. Bass, Berry & Sims has served CLARCOR as primary corporate and securities counsel for 10 years and served as lead counsel on this transaction. Read more here.

CLARCOR
Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

Securities Law Exchange BlogSecurities Law Exchange blog offers insight on the latest legal and regulatory developments affecting publicly traded companies. It focuses on a wide variety of topics including regulation and reporting updates, public company advisory topics, IPO readiness and exchange updates including IPO announcements, M&A trends and deal news.

Read More >

Chris Lazarini Provides Insight on Trustee's Power to Agree to Arbitrate Future Claims

Securities Litigation Commentator

Publications

May 2, 2016

Bass, Berry & Sims attorney Chris Lazarini provided insight on a case challenging the power of a trustee to agree to arbitrate unknown or future claims of the trust. After a de novo review, the court holds the trustee is without such power because the word "claim" does not include disputes that have not yet arisen and an agreement to arbitrate unknown or future disputes may not be in the best interests of the trust. Chris provided the analysis for Securities Litigation Commentator (SLC). The full text of the analysis is below and used with permission from the publication. If you would like to receive additional content from the SLC, please visit the SLC website to sign up for the newsletter.

Gladden vs. Cumberland Trust and Investment Co., No. E2015-00941-COA-R9 (Tenn. App., 3/24/16) 

A trustee's signature on an account agreement containing an arbitration clause is not binding on the beneficiary of the trust as to future disputes where the Trust Agreement does not confer on the Trustee the power to so bind the beneficiary. 

This matter concerns the interpretation of a Trustee's powers in a Trust created for the benefit of a disabled minor. The Trust Agreement ("Agreement") gave the Trustee "all powers" conferred by the Agreement, common law, "any fiduciary powers act" or other Tennessee law. The Agreement specifically authorized the Trustee to "settle, by compromise, arbitration, or otherwise any and all claims and demands" relating to the Trust.

The court-appointed corporate trustee opened an advisory account on behalf of the Trust, and signed a brokerage account agreement, which included an agreement to arbitrate "any and all disputes" with the advisor. Plaintiff, the child's grandfather and court-appointed guardian, later filed a state court action against the corporate trustee and the advisor, alleging mismanagement and misappropriation of Trust funds. The trial court granted the advisor's motion to compel arbitration. The trial court and the Court of Appeals then granted Plaintiff's motion for interlocutory appeal on the issue of whether the Trustee's signature on the advisor's agreement binds the minor beneficiary to arbitrate unknown future disputes or claims.

Conducting a de novo review, the Court rejects the advisor's argument that the "any and all claims" language in the Agreement covers both existing claims, and disputes that have not yet arisen. Instead, the Court, relying on Black's Law Dictionary, finds the word "claim" does not include disputes that have not yet arisen. The unambiguous language of the Agreement, the Court concludes, only gives the Trustee power to agree to arbitrate claims after they arise. The Trustee does not have the power to agree to arbitration prior to a claim or demand arising, an action which, the Court notes, might not be in the best interest of the minor beneficiary and might violate the Trustee's duties. 

This result may be surprising to broker/dealers and investment advisors who rely on a trustee's power to execute binding contracts when opening trust accounts. A review of the appellate briefs reveals that the Trustee was empowered to execute and deliver contracts necessary to carry out any of the powers granted in the Agreement, which powers included engaging registered investment advisors to manage trust investments. The Court does not address this power in what appears to be a results-driven decision.


Related Professionals

Related Services

Notice

Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.