Close X
Attorney Spotlight

Find out which two countries Cheryl Palmeri gets the most questions about related to International Trade in today's market? Find out more>


Close X


Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

In June 2016, AmSurg Corp. and Envision Healthcare Holdings, Inc. (Envision) announced they have signed a definitive merger agreement pursuant to which the companies will combine in an all-stock transaction. Upon completion of the merger, which is expected to be tax-free to the shareholders of both organizations, the combined company will be named Envision Healthcare Corporation and co-headquartered in Nashville, Tennessee and Greenwood Village, Colorado. The company's common stock is expected to trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol: EVHC. Bass, Berry & Sims served as lead counsel on the transaction, led by Jim Jenkins. Read more.

AmSurg logo

Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

Inside the FCA blogInside the FCA blog features ongoing updates related to the False Claims Act (FCA), including insight on the latest legal decisions, regulatory developments and FCA settlements. The blog provides timely updates for corporate boards, directors, compliance managers, general counsel and other parties interested in the organizational impact and legal developments stemming from issues potentially giving rise to FCA liability.

Read More >

Update to Tennessee's Data Breach Notification Law Creates Notification Deadline and Includes Encrypted Data

Firm Publication


April 1, 2016

On March 24, 2016, Tennessee's Governor Bill Haslam signed SB2005/HB1631, amending Tennessee's data breach notification statute, Tenn. Code § 47-18-2107. The amendment, which will take effect July 1, 2016, makes significant changes to the current requirements for data breaches affecting Tennessee residents. 

First, the amendment changes how quickly businesses must notify Tennessee residents affected by a data breach. Previously, the statute required individual notification in the most expedient time possible and without reasonable delay. The updated law will now require businesses to notify affected individuals immediately, and in any case within 45 days, after discovery of the breach (unless a delay is required by law enforcement investigating the breach).1 Most states still only require a "without reasonable delay" standard. Tennessee joins a small but growing number of states that require notification within a certain time period (e.g., Florida, Ohio). 

The amendment also removes the statute's previous provision allowing for companies to time notification in light of the company's efforts to determine the scope of the breach and restore "the reasonable integrity of the data system." As amended, there is no longer an allowance to consider such investigative and system restoration measures taken by a company when determining whether the timing of notices complies with the statute. 

SB2005/HB1631 also amends Tennessee's statute to expand the categories of data breaches that are subject to notification requirements under Tennessee law. Companies will now need to notify individuals of instances of unauthorized access to or acquisition of their personal information, even if it is encrypted. This is a significant difference from most other states, which only require notification in the event of disclosures of unencrypted information. 

The amendment will also modify the definition of "unauthorized person," triggering a breach notification to include employees who have obtained personal information and intentionally used such information for an unlawful purpose. This change will expressly address instances where a company's employee has improperly accessed personal information held by the company, requiring a company to notify Tennessee residents affected by such use if otherwise required under the statute.

Finally, while there is currently an exemption for entities subject to Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (GLBA), the amendment creates an additional exemption for entities that are subject to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA).

This change to the statute has been misreported elsewhere as requiring a 14-day notification. However, the correct timing requirement under the bill as amended and signed by Gov. Haslam is 45 days.

Related Professionals

Related Services


Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.