Close X
Attorney Spotlight

Find out which two countries Cheryl Palmeri gets the most questions about related to International Trade in today's market? Find out more>


Close X


Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

In June 2016, AmSurg Corp. and Envision Healthcare Holdings, Inc. (Envision) announced they have signed a definitive merger agreement pursuant to which the companies will combine in an all-stock transaction. Upon completion of the merger, which is expected to be tax-free to the shareholders of both organizations, the combined company will be named Envision Healthcare Corporation and co-headquartered in Nashville, Tennessee and Greenwood Village, Colorado. The company's common stock is expected to trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol: EVHC. Bass, Berry & Sims served as lead counsel on the transaction, led by Jim Jenkins. Read more.

AmSurg logo

Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

Inside the FCA blogInside the FCA blog features ongoing updates related to the False Claims Act (FCA), including insight on the latest legal decisions, regulatory developments and FCA settlements. The blog provides timely updates for corporate boards, directors, compliance managers, general counsel and other parties interested in the organizational impact and legal developments stemming from issues potentially giving rise to FCA liability.

Read More >

Chris Lazarini Examines Confirmation of Arbitration Award Under FAA

Securities Litigation Commentator


April 12, 2016

Bass, Berry & Sims attorney Chris Lazarini examined this case in which an arbitration award was confirmed under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). Chris provided the analysis for Securities Litigation Commentator (SLC). The full text of the analysis is below and used with permission from the publication. If you would like to receive additional content from the SLC, please visit the SLC website to sign up for the newsletter.

Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. vs. Barker, No. 1:15-cv-328 (S.D. Ohio, 2/29/16) 

*Under the Federal Arbitration Act, Award confirmation is a summary proceeding and the court must confirm the Award unless it is vacated, modified, or corrected.
**The time for seeking to vacate, modify, or correct an arbitration Award is three months after the Award is filed or delivered, while a party may seek to confirm the Award at any time within one year after the Award is made. 

This is a textbook example of how an arbitration award gets confirmed under the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA"). When Defendant joined Merrill Lynch in 2007, he signed a Promissory Note ("Note") evidencing a forgivable loan received from the firm. The Note was modified and extended in 2009. Defendant voluntarily resigned from Merrill Lynch in 2012, owing $298,000 on the Note, which amount became due and immediately payable. When Defendant failed to meet Merrill Lynch's payment demand, the firm instituted a FINRA arbitration. The parties settled prior to the final hearing, and the settlement terms were adopted by the arbitration Panel in the Award (FINRA ID #12-04150 (Cincinnati, 5/20/14)).

Merrill Lynch filed this action seeking confirmation of the Award and entry of a final judgment. Defendant did not respond, and the Court, after issuing a show cause order, construes Merrill Lynch's motion as unopposed. The Court notes that the FAA presumes an arbitration Award will be confirmed unless the Award is vacated, modified, or corrected. The Court also notes that the three-month time period for seeking to vacate, modify, or correct the Award has passed. The Court thus finds that it must confirm the Award and enter a final judgment for Merrill Lynch.

Related Professionals

Related Services


Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.