Close X

Attorney Spotlight

How does Eli Richardson's past work with the federal government inform his client interactions? Find out more>

Search

Close X

Experience

Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

In June 2016, AmSurg Corp. and Envision Healthcare Holdings, Inc. (Envision) announced they have signed a definitive merger agreement pursuant to which the companies will combine in an all-stock transaction. Upon completion of the merger, which is expected to be tax-free to the shareholders of both organizations, the combined company will be named Envision Healthcare Corporation and co-headquartered in Nashville, Tennessee and Greenwood Village, Colorado. The company's common stock is expected to trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol: EVHC. Bass, Berry & Sims served as lead counsel on the transaction, led by Jim Jenkins. Read more.

AmSurg logo


Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

Inside the FCA blogInside the FCA blog features ongoing updates related to the False Claims Act (FCA), including insight on the latest legal decisions, regulatory developments and FCA settlements. The blog provides timely updates for corporate boards, directors, compliance managers, general counsel and other parties interested in the organizational impact and legal developments stemming from issues potentially giving rise to FCA liability.

Read More >

GovCon Blog: Will M&A Services Continue to Outperform?

Firm Publication

Publications

February 22, 2016

Recent mergers and acquisitions activity among government contractors has been frothy, especially in the government services sector. What has been driving all the activity? Elevated stock prices and readily available credit has certainly accounted for some of it, at least until the recent decline of capital markets at the end of 2015 and thus far in 2016. However, even with the capital markets decline, there are macro trends specific to government services that at least partially counteract the decline of the broader market and cause many in the sector to remain relatively bullish on continued M&A activity.

The most important of these macro trends are contract vehicle consolidation and a shift toward low price-technically acceptable (LPTA) awards. During President Obama's term, in the name of budgetary concerns, the administration has worked with agencies to reduce the number of federal contracts by consolidating contracts into fewer and larger vehicles. Mid-sized government services players need to grow larger to be able to continue to compete for these larger vehicles. They often seek growth by acquiring other contractors with sought-after, differentiated capabilities and deep customer relationships. Buyers are choosy when it comes to acquisitions, and contract consolidation has made it more difficult to accurately analyze whether a target's contracts will be eliminated altogether or consolidated into a larger vehicle. This makes valuations a challenge, which helps explain why we see a fair number of earn-outs based on renewals of specific contracts. However, companies with coveted prime positions on full and open contract awards with a good backlog can find themselves highly desired targets.

www.BassBerryGovCon.com image

To continue reading the content in this article on the firm's Government Contracts blog, please click here to view the post.

Bass, Berry & Sims' Government Contracts blog features news, commentary and insight on the demanding and ever-changing regulatory environment of contracting with federal, state and local governments, and international trade issues when conducting a global business.

 

 


Related Professionals

Related Services

Notice

Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.