Close X

Attorney Spotlight

How does Eli Richardson's past work with the federal government inform his client interactions? Find out more>

Search

Close X

Experience

Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

In June 2016, AmSurg Corp. and Envision Healthcare Holdings, Inc. (Envision) announced they have signed a definitive merger agreement pursuant to which the companies will combine in an all-stock transaction. Upon completion of the merger, which is expected to be tax-free to the shareholders of both organizations, the combined company will be named Envision Healthcare Corporation and co-headquartered in Nashville, Tennessee and Greenwood Village, Colorado. The company's common stock is expected to trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol: EVHC. Bass, Berry & Sims served as lead counsel on the transaction, led by Jim Jenkins. Read more.

AmSurg logo


Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

Inside the FCA blogInside the FCA blog features ongoing updates related to the False Claims Act (FCA), including insight on the latest legal decisions, regulatory developments and FCA settlements. The blog provides timely updates for corporate boards, directors, compliance managers, general counsel and other parties interested in the organizational impact and legal developments stemming from issues potentially giving rise to FCA liability.

Read More >

GovCon Blog: Failure to Follow Evaluation Criteria Remains Among Top Reasons for Sustained Protests

Publications

December 15, 2015

At the close of each fiscal year, the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) is required by the Competition in Contracting Act of 1984 (CICA) to submit a report of the bid protests before the GAO. A significant number of protests filed do not reach a merit decision due to voluntary corrective action. Because agencies are not required to report any reasons for voluntary corrective action, these yearly reports are particularly helpful in analyzing trends and concerns for contractors. Highlights from the FY2015 report:

The sustain rate has been declining since the 18.6% reported in FY2012; in FY2015 there were only 68 sustains out of the 587 merit decisions (12%). In FY2014, there were 72 sustains out of 556 merit decisions (13%). However, the number of cases filed has steadily increased since the 2,429 cases filed in FY2013, with 2,639 filed in FY2015.

About 13% of the cases closed this year were task or delivery order protests under IDIQ contracts, of which GAO has exclusive bid protest jurisdiction for challenges to task or delivery orders greater than $10 million. Almost 12% of closed cases in FY2014 were attributed to task or delivery orders.

In addition, the GAO is required to specify the following in their yearly report:

(1) Instances when a federal agency does not fully implement a GAO recommendation

This occurred once in FY2015. The case in question involved GAO’s determination that two contractors did not qualify as United States Persons under the Security Act. However, in spite of GAO’s recommendation, the Department of State chose to follow a Court of Federal Claims interpretation of the Act. Caddell Constr. Co., Inc., B-411005.1, B411005.2, Apr. 20, 2015, 2015 CPD ¶ 132.

(2) Any time GAO does not render a final protest decision within 100 days after filing

There were no instances of this in FY2015. This is a marked difference from FY2014, when GAO reported 39 cases that went beyond the 100-day time frame as a result of the Government shutdown.

(3) A summary of the most prevalent grounds for sustaining protests

In the three years that GAO has been required to report the most prevalent reasons for sustained protests, failure to follow evaluation criteria has remained among the top reasons. In addition, GAO featured five reasons in FY2015 rather than the four reported in previous years.

The top five reasons for sustaining a protest in FY2015:

  • Unreasonable cost or price evaluation
  • Unreasonable past performance evaluation
  • Failure to follow evaluation criteria
  • Inadequate documentation of the record
  • Unreasonable technical evaluation

Savvy contractors can view this as a "checklist" of things to be aware of in their own procurements, as agency mistakes are the primary reasons for sustained protests.

Read more about government contracts on www.bassberrygovcon.com.


Related Professionals

Related Services

Notice

Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.