Close X
Attorney Spotlight

Find out which two countries Cheryl Palmeri gets the most questions about related to International Trade in today's market? Find out more>


Close X


Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

In June 2016, AmSurg Corp. and Envision Healthcare Holdings, Inc. (Envision) announced they have signed a definitive merger agreement pursuant to which the companies will combine in an all-stock transaction. Upon completion of the merger, which is expected to be tax-free to the shareholders of both organizations, the combined company will be named Envision Healthcare Corporation and co-headquartered in Nashville, Tennessee and Greenwood Village, Colorado. The company's common stock is expected to trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol: EVHC. Bass, Berry & Sims served as lead counsel on the transaction, led by Jim Jenkins. Read more.

AmSurg logo

Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

Inside the FCA blogInside the FCA blog features ongoing updates related to the False Claims Act (FCA), including insight on the latest legal decisions, regulatory developments and FCA settlements. The blog provides timely updates for corporate boards, directors, compliance managers, general counsel and other parties interested in the organizational impact and legal developments stemming from issues potentially giving rise to FCA liability.

Read More >

GovCon Blog: The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Impact on Trade and Procurement


November 23, 2015

Late in the night of October 5, 2015, twelve countries concluded negotiations on a groundbreaking free-trade agreement to liberalize trade. The Trans-Pacific Partnership ("TPP") is a free-trade agreement between the United States, Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Peru, Singapore, New Zealand and Vietnam.

The TPP, which still requires approval from Congress, is part of the Obama Administration's efforts to gain market access in the growing economies of Asia and balancing out China's increasing economic influence. While China, South Korea and other major players in Asia are not parties to the agreement, there is hope that they will choose to join. Several nations, including Indonesia and the Philippines, have already expressed interest in joining the agreement once it goes into effect.

Like all free-trade agreements, the TPP requires the countries involved to substantially reduce barriers to trade, including tariffs on goods and services. While some tariffs will be eliminated entirely, tariffs on politically sensitive goods such as automobiles, types of apparel and dairy products will drop more gradually.

Increasing access between the markets of the 12 participants is also likely to impact government procurement competition domestically and provide more opportunities for American companies abroad. The TPP includes a specific chapter on government procurement, which is intended to improve market access for U.S. firms to provide goods and services to those countries that undertake procurement projects, and to provide reciprocal opportunities in the United States. The government procurement chapter includes regulations on issuing solicitations, accepting bids and awarding contracts, as well as a requirement that parties treat foreign goods and services no less favorably than those of domestic producers.

Transparency is also a requirement under the TPP, which will help companies to better understand the processes behind government procurement projects. The United States has experience in abiding by these types of regulations; many of the TPP nations already have free-trade agreements with the United States that require market access for foreign companies seeking government contracts. However, the United States does not currently have free-trade agreements with Brunei, Malaysia, or Vietnam, and increased access to these markets should create significant opportunities for U.S. companies. Those opportunities will only expand further if other countries join the TPP.

The benefits, however, do not come without some possible costs to U.S. contractors, as enactment of the TPP would mean an increase in competition for federal government contracts. However, any uptick in competition is unlikely to have a pronounced impact initially, because many of the 12 countries have already had opportunities to bid for U.S. government contracts under the current system of free-trade agreements. Additionally, national security and defense contracts are exempted from the TPP government procurement chapter, and will continue to be filled by domestic or other eligible foreign companies. State and local government procurement will also be excluded under this agreement. And goods covered by the Buy American Act are also exempted from the government procurement chapter of the TPP. We therefore anticipate an overall positive affect on U.S. government contractors, particularly those contractors interested in procurements with international governments.

Read more about government contracts on

Related Professionals

Related Services


Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.