Close X
Attorney Spotlight

What television show influenced Chad Jarboe's decision to pursue a career in the legal field? Find out more>

Search

Close X

Experience

Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

Primary Care Providers Win Challenge of CMS Interpretation of Enhanced Payment Law

With the help and support of the Tennessee Medical Association, 21 Tennessee physicians of underserved communities joined together and retained Bass, Berry & Sims to file suit against the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to stop improper collection efforts. Our team, led by David King, was successful in halting efforts to recoup TennCare payments that were used legitimately to expand services in communities that needed them. Read more

Tennessee Medical Association & Bass, Berry & Sims

Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

Healthcare Transactions: Year in Review 2018Last year, CVS Health Corp. (NYSE: CVS) announced it would purchase health insurer Aetna Inc. (NYSE: AET) for $67.5 billion, a transaction that would be one of the biggest healthcare mergers in the past decade. The transaction raises an intriguing question: is this the beginning of a transformational shift in healthcare?

Recently, members of our healthcare group authored the Healthcare Transactions: Year in Review outlining 2017 M&A activity and drivers in the following hot healthcare sectors:

• Managed Care
• Hospitals
• Post-Acute Care—Home Health & Hospice
• Ambulatory Surgery Centers (ASCs)
• Healthcare Information Technology (HIT)
• Behavioral Health
• Physician Practice Management

Read now

Labor Talk Blog: NLRB "Punts" - Declines To Assert Jurisdiction Over Northwestern Football Players

Publications

August 17, 2015

In a ruling on August 17, 2015, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) decided that it should not exercise jurisdiction over the unionization attempts by Northwestern football players. The NLRB "punted" the issue and declined to decide whether the football players were employees permitted to unionize under the National Labor Relations Act.

So, why did the NLRB decline jurisdiction? Because, it says, asserting jurisdiction only over the Northwestern football players would not "promote stability in labor relations." Here's some of the reasons why:

  • The NLRB noted that it has jurisdiction only over private universities, which make up only 17 of the approximately 125 universities in Division I Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS).
  • The NLRB found that the history of oversight in bargaining in analogous professional sports has never involved recognition of a unit comprised of only one sports team;
    • Rather administrative oversight of bargaining has included the entire sports league;
    • Here, however, the NLRB is being asked to assert jurisdiction over only one team and the players of other competing teams would not be represented or are entirely outside the NLRB’s jurisdiction.
  • Since the Northwestern football program faces regulation not simply from the school but also from the Big Ten and the NCAA, and since Northwestern is the only private university in the Big Ten and only one of 17 private universities in the FBS of the NCAA Division I, exercising jurisdiction would not promote the stability of labor relations.

So, what does this mean for employers?

  • Candidly, not much.
  • Employers may take some comfort that the NLRB in this instance likely got it right.
  • The ruling may give some fodder to private employers battling "micro-units" as the decision does have some helpful language in that regard.
  • Look for continued effort by the union to push at the conference and NCAA level for more oversight on behalf of the players and their desire to be paid a stipend or for the use of their images, and to discuss other health and welfare issues.

For more labor and employment information, visit www.BassBerryLaborTalk.com


Related Professionals

Related Services

Notice

Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.