Close X
Attorney Spotlight

What is Shannon Wiley looking forward to at this year's Asembia Specialty Pharmacy Summit? Find out more>


Close X


Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

Primary Care Providers Win Challenge of CMS Interpretation of Enhanced Payment Law

With the help and support of the Tennessee Medical Association, 21 Tennessee physicians of underserved communities joined together and retained Bass, Berry & Sims to file suit against the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to stop improper collection efforts. Our team, led by David King, was successful in halting efforts to recoup TennCare payments that were used legitimately to expand services in communities that needed them. Read more

Tennessee Medical Association & Bass, Berry & Sims

Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

Download the Healthcare Fraud & Abuse Review 2017, authored by Bass, Berry & Sims

The Healthcare Fraud & Abuse Review 2017 details all healthcare-related False Claims Act settlements from last year, organized by particular sectors of the healthcare industry. In addition to reviewing all healthcare fraud-related settlements, the Review includes updates on enforcement-related litigation involving the Stark Law and Anti-Kickback Statute, and looks at the continued implications from the government's focus on enforcement efforts involving individual actors in connection with civil and criminal healthcare fraud investigations.

Click here to download the Review.

GovCon Blog: Successful GAO Bid Protest of VA Award


July 24, 2015

We represented Ed Medical, Inc., a Tennessee-based full service home medical supply provider, in a successful bid protest at the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO). For the past 11 years, Ed Medical has been providing home oxygen services for the Veterans Administration (VA) . Ed Medical's VA contract covers Region 9 of the Veterans Integrated Services Network (VISN 9) which includes Tennessee and Kentucky, as well as portions of Mississippi and West Virginia. Last year, the VA released a solicitation for follow-on work in VISN 9, for which Ed Medical submitted a competitive proposal. 

In March 2015, the VA announced an award under the solicitation to another contractor, revealing the award price of approximately $18 million. Given Ed Medical's vast experience providing home oxygen services in the region, it was immediately clear the price of the award was far too low for the work required. Thus, we filed a bid protest at GAO challenging the VA's award decision based on the award price.

In the protest, we argued that the Solicitation required the VA to evaluate each offeror's proposed price to determine whether it was realistic, i.e., whether the offeror could actually perform the work for the proposed price. The record demonstrated that the VA failed to conduct the price realism analysis, and awarded the contract without considering the risk inherent with such an unrealistically low price.  GAO agreed with our argument and sustained the protest on those grounds. The VA was instructed to take corrective action and reevaluate the offeror's price proposals for realism, and potentially make a new source selection decision.

To read the decision, click here.

Read more about government contracts on

Related Professionals

Related Services


Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.