Close X
Attorney Spotlight

What television show influenced Chad Jarboe's decision to pursue a career in the legal field? Find out more>

Search

Close X

Experience

Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

Primary Care Providers Win Challenge of CMS Interpretation of Enhanced Payment Law

With the help and support of the Tennessee Medical Association, 21 Tennessee physicians of underserved communities joined together and retained Bass, Berry & Sims to file suit against the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to stop improper collection efforts. Our team, led by David King, was successful in halting efforts to recoup TennCare payments that were used legitimately to expand services in communities that needed them. Read more

Tennessee Medical Association & Bass, Berry & Sims

Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

Healthcare Transactions: Year in Review 2018Last year, CVS Health Corp. (NYSE: CVS) announced it would purchase health insurer Aetna Inc. (NYSE: AET) for $67.5 billion, a transaction that would be one of the biggest healthcare mergers in the past decade. The transaction raises an intriguing question: is this the beginning of a transformational shift in healthcare?

Recently, members of our healthcare group authored the Healthcare Transactions: Year in Review outlining 2017 M&A activity and drivers in the following hot healthcare sectors:

• Managed Care
• Hospitals
• Post-Acute Care—Home Health & Hospice
• Ambulatory Surgery Centers (ASCs)
• Healthcare Information Technology (HIT)
• Behavioral Health
• Physician Practice Management

Read now

New Cybersecurity Framework to be "Industry-Friendly"

Publications

February 20, 2014

As mentioned in our previous Alert, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) recently released the long-anticipated "Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity" (FICIC). Yesterday, the Director of the NIST, Peter Gallagher, answered questions about the Framework and its creation, goals, and future use.

In a nationally-broadcast panel discussion, Gallagher emphasized that the FICIC is industry-driven, industry-focused, and industry-friendly. Gallagher commented that, after a decade of failed federal legislation, the Framework offers much needed guidance in the area of cybersecurity. It was drafted with full and open collaboration with industry professionals, and it was built upon practices that had already been tried and proven in the market.

While Gallagher described the FICIC as a flexible, living document, he stated that did not mean that the Framework is a preliminary model that can be set aside until a more permanent model comes along. "If you're waiting for this to settle down before you do anything about it, you're going to miss the train," said Gallagher. "[T]he Framework will actually be driven by those who are the users and adopters of it." 

Although the FICIC itself is not mandatory, it is expected to set the standard for vague terms such as "reasonable" and "adequate" that are scattered throughout preexisting data security laws and regulations. The FICIC should be welcomed by anyone who has had to determine the "reasonableness" or "adequacy" of their company's security policy, training, response plan, etc. 

Our Data Security, Privacy and Cyberliability team has extensive experience counseling clients on cybersecurity policies and practices, and representing clients who have been affected by a security breach or other cyber incident. We welcome your questions about the FICIC, as well as any other aspect of cybersecurity risks, principles, or procedures. 

For more information about the content of this Alert, please contact the author.


Related Professionals

Related Services

Notice

Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.