Close X
Attorney Spotlight

What is Shannon Wiley looking forward to at this year's Asembia Specialty Pharmacy Summit? Find out more>


Close X


Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

Primary Care Providers Win Challenge of CMS Interpretation of Enhanced Payment Law

With the help and support of the Tennessee Medical Association, 21 Tennessee physicians of underserved communities joined together and retained Bass, Berry & Sims to file suit against the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to stop improper collection efforts. Our team, led by David King, was successful in halting efforts to recoup TennCare payments that were used legitimately to expand services in communities that needed them. Read more

Tennessee Medical Association & Bass, Berry & Sims

Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

Download the Healthcare Fraud & Abuse Review 2017, authored by Bass, Berry & Sims

The Healthcare Fraud & Abuse Review 2017 details all healthcare-related False Claims Act settlements from last year, organized by particular sectors of the healthcare industry. In addition to reviewing all healthcare fraud-related settlements, the Review includes updates on enforcement-related litigation involving the Stark Law and Anti-Kickback Statute, and looks at the continued implications from the government's focus on enforcement efforts involving individual actors in connection with civil and criminal healthcare fraud investigations.

Click here to download the Review.

GovCon Blog: President Obama Authorizes Use of PL 85-804 to Protect Ebola Contractors


November 17, 2014

Contracting with the Federal Government frequently includes many unique risks and uncertainties. In the wake of the Ebola epidemic occurring overseas the United States has stepped in to provide assistance, much of which comes in the form of the use of contractors. Being exposed to Ebola is not a small risk and comes with many uncertainties including becoming subject to large third-party claims for injury, death or damages. In order to continue supporting these efforts in the Ebola outbreak, there has been a drive to mitigate this risk factor for contractors. On November 13, President Obama released a Presidential Memorandum granting the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) the authority to indemnify companies from lawsuits related to "contracts performed in Africa in support of USAID's response to the Ebola outbreak in Africa where the contractor, its employees, or subcontractors will have significant exposure to Ebola."

The ability to grant this authority comes from Public Law 85-804. Generally, the Government is prohibited from entering into open-ended indemnification agreements due to the Anti-Deficiency Act. However, Public Law 85-804 permits the President to authorize any federal agency or department connected to national security the ability to enter into, amend or modify contracts with private companies in order to "facilitate the national defense." This includes indemnifying government contractors against unusually hazardous or nuclear risks without regard to the availability of appropriated funds. The process under which indemnification is requested and negotiated is set forth in Part 50 of the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR).

In his memorandum, President Obama called the Ebola outbreak "a relevant state of national emergency," adding that "this memorandum and actions taken pursuant to that authorization would facilitate the national defense." The memorandum makes clear that the authority granted is "solely for the purpose of holding harmless and indemnifying contractors with respect to claims, losses, or damage arising out of or resulting from exposure, in the course of performance of the contracts, to Ebola."

For more Government Contracts information, visit

Related Professionals

Related Services


Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.