Close X
Attorney Spotlight

Learn about Richard Arnholt's diverse government contracts practice and why he chose to pursue a career in the legal field. Read more>

Search

Close X

Experience

Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

In June 2017, Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: PNFP) closed a $1.9 billion merger with BNC Bancorp (NASDAQ: BNCN) pursuant to which BNC merged with and into Pinnacle. With the completion of the transaction, Pinnacle becomes a Top 50 U.S. Bank. The merger will create a four state footprint concentrated in 12 of the largest urban markets in the Southeast. 

Bass, Berry & Sims has served Pinnacle as primary corporate and securities counsel for more than 15 years and served as counsel on the transaction. Our attorneys were involved in all aspects related to the agreement, including tax, employee benefits and litigation. 

Read more details about the transaction here.

Pinnacle Financial Partners logo

Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

Regulation A+

It seems that lately there has been a noticeable uptick in Regulation A+ activity, including several recent Reg A+ securities offerings where the stock now successfully trades on national exchanges. In light of this activity, we have published a set of FAQs about Regulation A+ securities offerings to help companies better understand this "mini-IPO" offering process, as well as pros and cons compared to a traditional underwritten IPO.

Read now

GovCon Blog: GAO Releases Annual Bid Protest Report: Corrective Actions on the Rise?

Publications

November 21, 2014

This week, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) released its annual Bid Protest Report for Fiscal Year 2014. GAO is required by the Competition in Contracting Act to submit this annual report to Congress. The report contains some information which may be of interest to contractors, particularly the bid protest statistics.

According to GAO, while the number of bid protests filed increased 5% versus FY2013, the number of sustained decisions decreased quite a bit. From FY2010 through FY2013, GAO sustained an average of 17.7% protests. The number of sustained protests fell sharply in FY2014, as less than 13% of cases were sustained.

However, this decrease in the sustain rate should not serve as a deterrent for potential protesters. The sustain rate only includes cases that make it all the way to a decision on the merits (sustain or deny). It does not include the instances where the protester received some form of requested relief, through a voluntary corrective action taken by the agency.

When factoring in voluntary corrective action, as well as sustained protests, protesters were "successful" on 43% of GAO protests in FY2014. This number has remained fairly steady over the past five years, falling in at either 42% or 43% each year.

Given the static nature of the "success" rate of protests and the decrease in sustained decisions, it can certainly be inferred that contracting agencies were much more willing to undertake voluntary corrective action in response to a protest. It is unclear if this trend will continue in the future, but those with an optimistic view would see this as a sign that agencies are becoming more likely to admit to and correct a mistake in a procurement. The pessimists among us would surely say that agencies are becoming more adept at using corrective action to fix weak spots in their procurement decisions. Whether the truth is one extreme or the other, or somewhere in the middle, this is certainly a trend worth monitoring.

For more Government Contracts information, visit www.BassBerryGovCon.com. 


Related Professionals

Related Services

Notice

Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.