Close X
Attorney Spotlight

How did Brianna Powell's work as a law clerk prepare her for practicing law? Read more>

Search

Close X

Experience

Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

The M&A Advisor Winner 2017The M&A Advisor announced the winners of the 16th Annual M&A Advisor Awards on Monday, November 13 at the 2017 M&A Advisor Awards. Bass, Berry & Sims was named a winner in the two categories related to the following deals:

M&A Deal of the Year (from $1B-$5B) – Acquisition of CLARCOR Inc. by Parker Hannifin Corporation

Corporate/Strategic Deal of the Year (over $1B) – Acquisition of BNC Bancorp by Pinnacle Financial Partners

Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

Regulation A+

It seems that lately there has been a noticeable uptick in Regulation A+ activity, including several recent Reg A+ securities offerings where the stock now successfully trades on national exchanges. In light of this activity, we have published a set of FAQs about Regulation A+ securities offerings to help companies better understand this "mini-IPO" offering process, as well as pros and cons compared to a traditional underwritten IPO.

Read now

Delaware Chancery Court Upholds Forum-Selection Bylaw Specifying Non-Delaware Jurisdiction

Publications

September 18, 2014

The Delaware Court of Chancery recently ruled that the board of directors of a Delaware corporation may amend its bylaws to specify a forum other than Delaware for litigating all intra-corporate disputes, such as stockholder claims alleging that officers or directors breached their fiduciary duties. In City of Providence v. First Citizens Bancshares, Inc., Cons. C.A. No. 9795-CB (Del. Ch. Sept. 8, 2014), the board of directors of First Citizens Bancshares, Inc., a Delaware corporation operating primarily in North Carolina, adopted and approved Amended and Restated Bylaws that included a forum selection bylaw naming the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, or, if that court lacks jurisdiction, any state court in North Carolina, as the exclusive forum for litigating intra-corporate disputes.

The Court of Chancery found that, while Delaware might be the most obvious forum in which to litigate the intra-corporate disputes of a Delaware corporation, choosing the "second most obviously reasonable forum" where the corporation operates and is headquartered, "does not … call into question the facial validity of the Forum Selection Bylaw" and there was no showing that "the Board's selection of North Carolina as the exclusive forum was irrational." (Slip Op. at pp. 10, 14). The Court noted that there was no reason why a non-Delaware court could not address and rule on issues of Delaware law, and that the plaintiff had failed to rebut the business judgment rule with respect to adoption of the challenged bylaw.

Assuming that this decision is not reversed on appeal, at least one Delaware court is now on record as approving a forum selection bylaw requiring stockholders in a Delaware corporation to litigate disputes in courts outside of Delaware. Directors considering such a bylaw should carefully weigh the pros and cons of selecting a non-Delaware forum, including but not limited to: (i) an analysis of local procedural and substantive rights that may be implicated by litigating in the chosen jurisdiction; (ii) the quality of the local judiciary (who likely will be asked to apply Delaware law); (iii) the likelihood that the frequency of litigation will increase or decrease; and (iv) any cost savings that may result from mandating what might be a more convenient forum for the corporation and its officers and directors. As with any decision, directors also should be aware that they are subject to fiduciary duties as defined under Delaware law and, thus, should consider whether adopting such a bylaw is in the best interests of the corporation and its stockholders only after fully informing themselves on the implications of selecting a given forum.


Related Services

Notice

Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.