Close X
Attorney Spotlight

What colorful method does Claire Miley use to keep up with the latest healthcare regulations as they relate to proposed transactions? Find out more>

Search

Close X

Experience

Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

On December 1, 2016, Parker Hannifin Corporation and CLARCOR Inc. announced that the companies have entered into a definitive agreement under which Parker will acquire CLARCOR for approximately $4.3 billion in cash, including the assumption of net debt. The transaction has been unanimously approved by the board of directors of each company. Upon closing of the transaction, expected to be completed by or during the first quarter of Parker’s fiscal year 2018, CLARCOR will be combined with Parker’s Filtration Group to form a leading and diverse global filtration business. Bass, Berry & Sims has served CLARCOR as primary corporate and securities counsel for 10 years and served as lead counsel on this transaction. Read more here.

CLARCOR
Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

Securities Law Exchange BlogSecurities Law Exchange blog offers insight on the latest legal and regulatory developments affecting publicly traded companies. It focuses on a wide variety of topics including regulation and reporting updates, public company advisory topics, IPO readiness and exchange updates including IPO announcements, M&A trends and deal news.

Read More >

Delaware Chancery Court Upholds Forum-Selection Bylaw Specifying Non-Delaware Jurisdiction

Publications

September 18, 2014

The Delaware Court of Chancery recently ruled that the board of directors of a Delaware corporation may amend its bylaws to specify a forum other than Delaware for litigating all intra-corporate disputes, such as stockholder claims alleging that officers or directors breached their fiduciary duties. In City of Providence v. First Citizens Bancshares, Inc., Cons. C.A. No. 9795-CB (Del. Ch. Sept. 8, 2014), the board of directors of First Citizens Bancshares, Inc., a Delaware corporation operating primarily in North Carolina, adopted and approved Amended and Restated Bylaws that included a forum selection bylaw naming the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, or, if that court lacks jurisdiction, any state court in North Carolina, as the exclusive forum for litigating intra-corporate disputes.

The Court of Chancery found that, while Delaware might be the most obvious forum in which to litigate the intra-corporate disputes of a Delaware corporation, choosing the "second most obviously reasonable forum" where the corporation operates and is headquartered, "does not … call into question the facial validity of the Forum Selection Bylaw" and there was no showing that "the Board's selection of North Carolina as the exclusive forum was irrational." (Slip Op. at pp. 10, 14). The Court noted that there was no reason why a non-Delaware court could not address and rule on issues of Delaware law, and that the plaintiff had failed to rebut the business judgment rule with respect to adoption of the challenged bylaw.

Assuming that this decision is not reversed on appeal, at least one Delaware court is now on record as approving a forum selection bylaw requiring stockholders in a Delaware corporation to litigate disputes in courts outside of Delaware. Directors considering such a bylaw should carefully weigh the pros and cons of selecting a non-Delaware forum, including but not limited to: (i) an analysis of local procedural and substantive rights that may be implicated by litigating in the chosen jurisdiction; (ii) the quality of the local judiciary (who likely will be asked to apply Delaware law); (iii) the likelihood that the frequency of litigation will increase or decrease; and (iv) any cost savings that may result from mandating what might be a more convenient forum for the corporation and its officers and directors. As with any decision, directors also should be aware that they are subject to fiduciary duties as defined under Delaware law and, thus, should consider whether adopting such a bylaw is in the best interests of the corporation and its stockholders only after fully informing themselves on the implications of selecting a given forum.


Related Services

Notice

Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.