Close X
Attorney Spotlight

Learn about Richard Arnholt's diverse government contracts practice and why he chose to pursue a career in the legal field. Read more>

Search

Close X

Experience

Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

In June 2017, Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: PNFP) closed a $1.9 billion merger with BNC Bancorp (NASDAQ: BNCN) pursuant to which BNC merged with and into Pinnacle. With the completion of the transaction, Pinnacle becomes a Top 50 U.S. Bank. The merger will create a four state footprint concentrated in 12 of the largest urban markets in the Southeast. 

Bass, Berry & Sims has served Pinnacle as primary corporate and securities counsel for more than 15 years and served as counsel on the transaction. Our attorneys were involved in all aspects related to the agreement, including tax, employee benefits and litigation. 

Read more details about the transaction here.

Pinnacle Financial Partners logo

Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

Regulation A+

It seems that lately there has been a noticeable uptick in Regulation A+ activity, including several recent Reg A+ securities offerings where the stock now successfully trades on national exchanges. In light of this activity, we have published a set of FAQs about Regulation A+ securities offerings to help companies better understand this "mini-IPO" offering process, as well as pros and cons compared to a traditional underwritten IPO.

Read now

Patent Trolls Who Send Bad Faith Demand Letters Are Now On The Hook for Damages and Attorneys' Fees in Tennessee

Publications

April 14, 2014

It's a familiar scenario: ABC Corporation receives a letter from a patent troll claiming that ABC Corporation is infringing a patent through a routine office activity. The letter claims that the damages for infringement could be enormous, but the troll will settle the case without litigation if ABC Corporation pays $1,000 per employee. Today, the Tennessee General Assembly sent a strong message that these types of letters will not be tolerated in Tennessee if sent in bad faith.

House Bill 2117/Senate Bill 1967 attempts to curtail abuse of the patent system by patent assertion entities (PAEs), pejoratively known as "patent trolls," which are typically non-practicing entities that acquire patents not to manufacture products or supply services based upon the acquired patents but to enforce the patents against alleged infringers in an attempt to collect licensing fees.  The bill, effective upon Governor Haslam's signature, which is expected within ten days, creates a cause of action for recipients of demand letters that assert patent infringement in bad faith.

The bill prohibits communications that:

  1. Threaten litigation if the recipient does not pay a license fee and the sender has demonstrated a consistent pattern of making similar threats without subsequently filing litigation;
  2. Falsely state that litigation has been filed; or
  3. Contain assertions without a reasonable basis in fact or law because:
    1. The person asserting the patent does not have the right to enforce the patent;
    2. The patent is invalid;
    3. The patent is expired; or
    4. The communication fails to include the identity of the patent owner, the patent number, or factual allegations concerning the specifics of the alleged infringement.

Under the bill, intended recipients of communications that meet any of these requirements may file suit in any Tennessee circuit or chancery court. Those who prevail shall be awarded litigation costs and fees, including attorneys' fees, and may be awarded actual damages as well as punitive damages equal to three times the amount of actual damages. In addition, the office of the attorney general is empowered to enforce the bill through its investigative and prosecutorial authority. 

By passing this bill, Tennessee joins several other states in their efforts to decrease the financial burden imposed on businesses by patent assertion entities. Kentucky, Oregon, Vermont, Virginia, Maine, Utah and Wisconsin are among the other states that have passed similar legislation or currently have such legislation pending.

On the federal legislative front, the U.S. Congress is also working to address abusive patent litigation. As we discussed in an earlier Alert, at least six patent reform bills are being considered by the current Congress. The House passed the Innovation Act in December 2013 and the Senate Judiciary Committee will consider the Patent Transparency and Improvements Act, sponsored by Sen. Patrick Leahy, when Congress resumes at the end of April. Similar to the Tennessee legislation, both Acts require greater transparency in patent infringement demand letters and include loser-pays provisions allowing courts to award reasonable fees and expenses of frivolous patent litigation to the prevailing party.

For more information on House Bill 2117/Senate Bill 1967 or any other aspect of Intellectual Property Litigation, please contact one of the authors of this alert.


Related Professionals

Related Services

Notice

Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.