Close X
Attorney Spotlight

What colorful method does Claire Miley use to keep up with the latest healthcare regulations as they relate to proposed transactions? Find out more>

Search

Close X

Experience

Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

On December 1, 2016, Parker Hannifin Corporation and CLARCOR Inc. announced that the companies have entered into a definitive agreement under which Parker will acquire CLARCOR for approximately $4.3 billion in cash, including the assumption of net debt. The transaction has been unanimously approved by the board of directors of each company. Upon closing of the transaction, expected to be completed by or during the first quarter of Parker’s fiscal year 2018, CLARCOR will be combined with Parker’s Filtration Group to form a leading and diverse global filtration business. Bass, Berry & Sims has served CLARCOR as primary corporate and securities counsel for 10 years and served as lead counsel on this transaction. Read more here.

CLARCOR
Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

Securities Law Exchange BlogSecurities Law Exchange blog offers insight on the latest legal and regulatory developments affecting publicly traded companies. It focuses on a wide variety of topics including regulation and reporting updates, public company advisory topics, IPO readiness and exchange updates including IPO announcements, M&A trends and deal news.

Read More >

Data Security & Privacy Litigation Update: Notes From Yesterday's IAPP Summit

Publications

March 7, 2014

For our in-house counsel clients and friends, here are a few "bits and bytes" from yesterday's "Privacy Litigation Risks: Update from the Trenches" session at the International Association of Privacy Professionals ("IAPP") Summit in Washington D.C.

Collecting Customer Zip Codes: What has been a common practice of many retail businesses – the practice of collecting customer zip codes at the point of sale – is now the subject of multi-state prohibitions and a tsunami of class action lawsuits. 16 states and the District of Columbia now have statutes banning the collection of customer zip codes under certain circumstances. The statutes vary in applicability and exceptions; however, the overall takeaway is that collecting customer zip codes and other PII in connection with sales or credit card transactions needs to be carefully evaluated for risk and compliance.

Cookie Tracking: Though they persist, cookie tracking class action lawsuits are still not gaining much traction. They have moved from federal courts, to state courts, and back to federal courts. However, plaintiffs are still having difficulties establishing damages and standing. That said, as technology changes and class action theories change, the most proactive step a company can take to protect itself remains full transparency about its use of cookies in its website privacy policy and terms of use.

Data Breaches: Class action litigation following data breaches has featured a multitude of different claims and theories of liability. Claims based on breach of contract, unjust enrichment, bailment, and invasion of privacy have generally been rejected, while claims based on common law negligence and consumer protection statutes are beginning to find some success.  At least some courts have allowed such claims to proceed in cases alleging "unreasonable" security measures or deceptive disclosures about security measures. Plaintiffs are still having difficulties establishing actual damages and the requisites for class certification; however, the threat remains, and the defensive costs are mounting.

If you are interested in more notes from the IAPP Summit, click here.

Feel free to contact a member of our Data Privacy & Security team if you have questions about data security, privacy or cyberliability issues.


Related Services

Notice

Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.