Close X
Attorney Spotlight

What colorful method does Claire Miley use to keep up with the latest healthcare regulations as they relate to proposed transactions? Find out more>

Search

Close X

Experience

Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

On December 1, 2016, Parker Hannifin Corporation and CLARCOR Inc. announced that the companies have entered into a definitive agreement under which Parker will acquire CLARCOR for approximately $4.3 billion in cash, including the assumption of net debt. The transaction has been unanimously approved by the board of directors of each company. Upon closing of the transaction, expected to be completed by or during the first quarter of Parker’s fiscal year 2018, CLARCOR will be combined with Parker’s Filtration Group to form a leading and diverse global filtration business. Bass, Berry & Sims has served CLARCOR as primary corporate and securities counsel for 10 years and served as lead counsel on this transaction. Read more here.

CLARCOR
Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

Securities Law Exchange BlogSecurities Law Exchange blog offers insight on the latest legal and regulatory developments affecting publicly traded companies. It focuses on a wide variety of topics including regulation and reporting updates, public company advisory topics, IPO readiness and exchange updates including IPO announcements, M&A trends and deal news.

Read More >

2013 Criminal Antitrust Fines Top $1 Billion for Second Straight Year

Publications

October 3, 2013

For the second straight year, the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) collected more than $1 billion in antitrust fines. This year’s $1.02 billion in fines for fiscal year 2013 confirms the DOJ’s resolve to attack price fixing violations as highlighted by massive price-fixing fines against auto parts manufacturers. This year’s hefty total is only slightly below the 2012 record of $1.14 billion, which included a price fixing fine leveled against an LCD display manufacturer that tied the highest price fixing fine ever imposed on a single company.

Last month, the DOJ announced an agreement with nine Japan-based auto parts manufacturers to pay $740 million in criminal fines for their roles in fixing the prices of more than 30 different auto products. Combined with penalties previously obtained against 11 other auto parts manufacturers, the DOJ now has obtained more than $1.6 billion in total criminal antitrust fines related to auto parts price fixing. In conjunction with the fines, the DOJ charged 21 auto parts company executives individually with criminal antitrust violations. Seventeen of the executives already have been sentenced to serve time in U.S. prisons or have entered into plea agreements calling for significant prison sentences.

In addition to the criminal fines for automotive parts price fixing, in 2013 the DOJ obtained significant criminal fines against numerous banks for their alleged manipulation of LIBOR benchmark interest rates.

The Bottom Line

In the last five years, criminal fines for antitrust violations in the U.S. are more than $4 billion which exceeds total criminal fines levied in the eight years of the Bush administration by more than $1 billion. This is further evidence that the promise of heightened enforcement of the antitrust laws by the Obama administration has become a reality and there is every reason to expect that 2014 likely will bring additional major antitrust investigations and penalties to companies in industries that may not yet expect them.

If you have questions about the content of this alert, please contact one of the authors listed above.


Related Professionals

Related Services

Notice

Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.