Close X
Attorney Spotlight

Learn about Richard Arnholt's diverse government contracts practice and why he chose to pursue a career in the legal field. Read more>

Search

Close X

Experience

Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

In June 2017, Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: PNFP) closed a $1.9 billion merger with BNC Bancorp (NASDAQ: BNCN) pursuant to which BNC merged with and into Pinnacle. With the completion of the transaction, Pinnacle becomes a Top 50 U.S. Bank. The merger will create a four state footprint concentrated in 12 of the largest urban markets in the Southeast. 

Bass, Berry & Sims has served Pinnacle as primary corporate and securities counsel for more than 15 years and served as counsel on the transaction. Our attorneys were involved in all aspects related to the agreement, including tax, employee benefits and litigation. 

Read more details about the transaction here.

Pinnacle Financial Partners logo

Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

Regulation A+

It seems that lately there has been a noticeable uptick in Regulation A+ activity, including several recent Reg A+ securities offerings where the stock now successfully trades on national exchanges. In light of this activity, we have published a set of FAQs about Regulation A+ securities offerings to help companies better understand this "mini-IPO" offering process, as well as pros and cons compared to a traditional underwritten IPO.

Read now

Opportunity to "Re-Set" Deadline for Comparative Chart Component of Participant Fee Disclosure

Publications

August 1, 2013

As required by final regulations on participant fee disclosure that became effective in 2012, a plan administrator of an individual account plan (such as a 401(k) plan or 403(b) plan) that allows participants to direct how their accounts are invested is required to provide participants and beneficiaries with certain information regarding the plan’s investment options, including a chart comparing the plan's investment options (the "comparative chart").1 The U.S. Department of Labor ("DOL") recently issued Field Assistance Bulletin 2013-022 (the "FAB") which gives plan administrators an opportunity to "re-set" the annual deadline for providing the comparative charts for their plans.

Under the regulations, a plan administrator was required to provide the first comparative chart by the later of (i) August 30, 2012 or (ii) 60 days after the first day of the plan year starting on or after November 1, 2011. The regulations require subsequent comparative charts to be provided to participants "at least annually thereafter," which the regulations define as at least once in any 12-month period. Accordingly, the deadline for the first comparative chart for a plan with a calendar year plan year was August 30, 2012, and the plan's deadline for subsequent comparative charts would be each anniversary of the date that the first comparative chart was provided. For example, if a plan administrator provided the first comparative chart on August 15, 2012, annual comparative charts would have to be provided by each August 15 thereafter.

Some plan administrators and service providers expressed concerns to the DOL regarding this timing. First, they noted that this timing would require a separate mailing because it does not correspond to any other participant disclosures and, as such, would increase administrative costs. Second, they contended that participants may be more likely to adequately consider the comparative chart if it is provided at other times, such as with benefits open enrollment materials or a quarterly participant benefit statement. In response to these concerns, the FAB gives a plan administrator an opportunity to "re-set" its annual deadline for providing the comparative chart by using one of the methods below if the plan administrator reasonably determines that doing so will benefit participants and beneficiaries:

  • A plan administrator may provide the second comparative chart no later than 18 months after the date that the first comparative chart was provided. The new annual deadline for the comparative chart will be the anniversary of the date that the second comparative chart is provided. For example, if a plan administrator chooses to provide the second comparative chart with benefits open enrollment materials on November 1, 2013, then annual comparative charts will have to be provided by each November 1 thereafter. 
  • If a plan administrator has or intends to provide the second comparative chart by its original deadline, the plan administrator may "re-set" its deadline with the third comparative chart so long as the third comparative chart is provided no later than 18 months after the date that the second comparative chart was provided. For example, if a plan administrator provided the first comparative chart on August 15, 2012, and intends to provide the second comparative chart on August 15, 2013, the deadline for the third comparative chart would be February 15, 2015. The new annual deadline for the comparative chart will be the anniversary of the date that the third comparative chart is provided.

Finally, the DOL announced in the FAB that it is considering an amendment to the fee disclosure regulations to allow a 30-day or 45-day window during which the annual comparative chart would have to be provided, rather than fixing the annual deadline to one specific day. The DOL requested comments on that approach.

Please contact a member of the Employee Benefits team if we can help you through this opportunity to "re-set" the deadline for your plan's comparative chart or with any other disclosure requirements.

________________________________________
1 The DOL's model comparative chart is available here.
2 Field Assistance Bulletin 2013-02 is available here.


Related Services

Notice

Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.