Close X
Attorney Spotlight

Find out which two countries Cheryl Palmeri gets the most questions about related to International Trade in today's market? Find out more>


Close X


Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

In June 2016, AmSurg Corp. and Envision Healthcare Holdings, Inc. (Envision) announced they have signed a definitive merger agreement pursuant to which the companies will combine in an all-stock transaction. Upon completion of the merger, which is expected to be tax-free to the shareholders of both organizations, the combined company will be named Envision Healthcare Corporation and co-headquartered in Nashville, Tennessee and Greenwood Village, Colorado. The company's common stock is expected to trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol: EVHC. Bass, Berry & Sims served as lead counsel on the transaction, led by Jim Jenkins. Read more.

AmSurg logo

Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

Inside the FCA blogInside the FCA blog features ongoing updates related to the False Claims Act (FCA), including insight on the latest legal decisions, regulatory developments and FCA settlements. The blog provides timely updates for corporate boards, directors, compliance managers, general counsel and other parties interested in the organizational impact and legal developments stemming from issues potentially giving rise to FCA liability.

Read More >

CFTC Division Issues No-Action Relief for Business Development Companies


December 18, 2012

On December 4, 2012, the Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight (the "DSIO") of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the "CFTC") issued CFTC Letter No. 12-40 (the "No-Action Letter"). The No-Action Letter grants relief from the commodity pool operator ("CPO") registration requirements for advisers of business development companies ("BDCs") that file a claim with the DSIO requesting such relief by December 31, 2012. Relief is necessary after the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 revised the definitions of "commodity pool" and "commodity pool operator" under the Commodity Exchange Act to expand the meaning of "commodity interests" to include any swap. This has resulted in commodity pool status being conferred on funds and similar enterprises that engage in swap activities, even if such activity is limited to trading in only one swap contract. As a result, operators of funds falling within the definition of a "commodity pool" will have to register with the CFTC as a CPO by December 31, 2012, unless regulatory exclusion or no-action relief is available.

BDCs are entities created by, and subject to regulation under, the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the "ICA"). Although CFTC Regulation 4.5 provides an exclusion from the CPO definition for "an investment company registered as such under the Investment Company Act of 1940," a BDC is not technically a registered investment company because it is exempt from registration under the ICA by virtue of its BDC election. Therefore, since BDCs are not technically registered investment companies, CFTC Regulation 4.5 as drafted does not apply to BDCs. However, because of the similarities between registered investment companies and BDCs, the DSIO has decided not to recommend that the CFTC take enforcement action against the operator of a BDC provided that the BDC satisfies the following criteria: 

  • The BDC has elected to be treated as a BDC under Section 54 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 with the SEC, and continues to be regulated by the SEC as a BDC;
  • The BDC will not be, and has not been, marketing participations to the public as or in a commodity pool or otherwise as or in a vehicle for trading in the commodity futures, commodity options, or swaps markets; and
  • Either:
    • The BDC uses commodity futures or commodity options contracts, or swaps solely for bona fide hedging purposes; provided, however, that in addition, with respect to positions in commodity futures or commodity option contracts, or swaps that are not used for hedging purposes, the aggregate initial margin and premiums required to establish such positions do not exceed 5% of the liquidation value of the BDC's portfolio (after taking into account certain adjustments); or
    • The aggregate net notional value of commodity futures, commodity options contracts, or swaps positions not used solely for bona fide hedging purposes, determined at the time the most recent position was established, does not exceed 100% of the liquidation value of the BDC's portfolio (after taking into account certain adjustments).

Importantly, the No-Action Letter is not self-executing. Therefore, any BDC that plans to take advantage of the no-action relief must file a claim for relief with the DSIO by December 31, 2012. A claim submitted by a CPO will be effective upon filing and is required to be signed by an authorized person and include only basic contact information.

If you have any questions regarding the issues addressed in this Corporate and Securities Law Alert, please contact any of the attorneys listed or the Bass, Berry & Sims attorney with whom you regularly work.

Related Services


Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.