Close X
Attorney Spotlight

What colorful method does Claire Miley use to keep up with the latest healthcare regulations as they relate to proposed transactions? Find out more>

Search

Close X

Experience

Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

On December 1, 2016, Parker Hannifin Corporation and CLARCOR Inc. announced that the companies have entered into a definitive agreement under which Parker will acquire CLARCOR for approximately $4.3 billion in cash, including the assumption of net debt. The transaction has been unanimously approved by the board of directors of each company. Upon closing of the transaction, expected to be completed by or during the first quarter of Parker’s fiscal year 2018, CLARCOR will be combined with Parker’s Filtration Group to form a leading and diverse global filtration business. Bass, Berry & Sims has served CLARCOR as primary corporate and securities counsel for 10 years and served as lead counsel on this transaction. Read more here.

CLARCOR
Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

Securities Law Exchange BlogSecurities Law Exchange blog offers insight on the latest legal and regulatory developments affecting publicly traded companies. It focuses on a wide variety of topics including regulation and reporting updates, public company advisory topics, IPO readiness and exchange updates including IPO announcements, M&A trends and deal news.

Read More >

CFPB Investigates Checking Account Overdraft Practices

Publications

February 24, 2012

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ("CFPB"), created by Title X of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, announced on Wednesday, February 22, 2012 that it was beginning an investigation of banks’ checking account overdraft practices.  The CFPB’s investigation will include three components: (1) gathering information from both banks and consumer advocates on current overdraft fee practices; (2) educating consumers on overdraft fee practices, starting with a consumer advisory on the CFPB website; and (3) suggesting a "penalty fee box" to highlight overdraft fees on bank statements.  The CFPB’s new investigation follows recent regulatory changes and scores of class action lawsuits challenging overdraft fee programs in recent years.

In his remarks announcing the new investigation, CFPB Director Richard Cordray specifically addressed posting order issues:

One of the practices that may contribute to consumer costs is transaction ordering.  Some banks do not process transactions in chronological order.  Instead, they collect the transactions from a specified period, such as a calendar day, and then process that set of transactions from highest amount to the lowest amount.  This approach can conceivably benefit consumers if it results in making certain that more significant payments – such as mortgage payments or student loan installments – get made.  The down side is that this approach also tends to maximize the number of transactions that trigger overdraft fees. 

Mr. Cordray also argued that many consumers did not understand the effect of overdraft protection despite recent amendments to Regulation E that required customers to affirmatively opt-in for overdraft protection on one-time debit card and ATM transactions.  He speculated that consumers may not understand the overdraft terms in their account agreements, or that consumers may have fallen victim to misleading or one-sided marketing materials.  Mr. Cordray also raised questions about banks' overdraft fee disclosures, asserting that "[o]verdraft provisions are often masked by the fine print of complex checking account agreements."

Of course, the CFPB’s new inquiry into overdraft fee practices will only heighten the already-intense scrutiny by the media, consumer advocates, bank examiners and the plaintiffs' bar.  Our financial institutions attorneys are experienced both in advising financial institutions on their overdraft fee practices and in defending financial institutions against class action litigation based on those practices.  We will continue to monitor the developments in overdraft fee regulation and litigation and provide updates as appropriate. 


Related Professionals

Related Services

Notice

Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.