Close X

Attorney Spotlight

How does Eli Richardson's past work with the federal government inform his client interactions? Find out more>

Search

Close X

Experience

Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

In June 2016, AmSurg Corp. and Envision Healthcare Holdings, Inc. (Envision) announced they have signed a definitive merger agreement pursuant to which the companies will combine in an all-stock transaction. Upon completion of the merger, which is expected to be tax-free to the shareholders of both organizations, the combined company will be named Envision Healthcare Corporation and co-headquartered in Nashville, Tennessee and Greenwood Village, Colorado. The company's common stock is expected to trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol: EVHC. Bass, Berry & Sims served as lead counsel on the transaction, led by Jim Jenkins. Read more.

AmSurg logo


Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

Inside the FCA blogInside the FCA blog features ongoing updates related to the False Claims Act (FCA), including insight on the latest legal decisions, regulatory developments and FCA settlements. The blog provides timely updates for corporate boards, directors, compliance managers, general counsel and other parties interested in the organizational impact and legal developments stemming from issues potentially giving rise to FCA liability.

Read More >

CFPB Investigates Checking Account Overdraft Practices

Publications

February 24, 2012

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ("CFPB"), created by Title X of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, announced on Wednesday, February 22, 2012 that it was beginning an investigation of banks’ checking account overdraft practices.  The CFPB’s investigation will include three components: (1) gathering information from both banks and consumer advocates on current overdraft fee practices; (2) educating consumers on overdraft fee practices, starting with a consumer advisory on the CFPB website; and (3) suggesting a "penalty fee box" to highlight overdraft fees on bank statements.  The CFPB’s new investigation follows recent regulatory changes and scores of class action lawsuits challenging overdraft fee programs in recent years.

In his remarks announcing the new investigation, CFPB Director Richard Cordray specifically addressed posting order issues:

One of the practices that may contribute to consumer costs is transaction ordering.  Some banks do not process transactions in chronological order.  Instead, they collect the transactions from a specified period, such as a calendar day, and then process that set of transactions from highest amount to the lowest amount.  This approach can conceivably benefit consumers if it results in making certain that more significant payments – such as mortgage payments or student loan installments – get made.  The down side is that this approach also tends to maximize the number of transactions that trigger overdraft fees. 

Mr. Cordray also argued that many consumers did not understand the effect of overdraft protection despite recent amendments to Regulation E that required customers to affirmatively opt-in for overdraft protection on one-time debit card and ATM transactions.  He speculated that consumers may not understand the overdraft terms in their account agreements, or that consumers may have fallen victim to misleading or one-sided marketing materials.  Mr. Cordray also raised questions about banks' overdraft fee disclosures, asserting that "[o]verdraft provisions are often masked by the fine print of complex checking account agreements."

Of course, the CFPB’s new inquiry into overdraft fee practices will only heighten the already-intense scrutiny by the media, consumer advocates, bank examiners and the plaintiffs' bar.  Our financial institutions attorneys are experienced both in advising financial institutions on their overdraft fee practices and in defending financial institutions against class action litigation based on those practices.  We will continue to monitor the developments in overdraft fee regulation and litigation and provide updates as appropriate. 


Related Professionals

Related Services

Notice

Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.