Close X
Attorney Spotlight

Find out which two countries Cheryl Palmeri gets the most questions about related to International Trade in today's market? Find out more>


Close X


Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

In June 2016, AmSurg Corp. and Envision Healthcare Holdings, Inc. (Envision) announced they have signed a definitive merger agreement pursuant to which the companies will combine in an all-stock transaction. Upon completion of the merger, which is expected to be tax-free to the shareholders of both organizations, the combined company will be named Envision Healthcare Corporation and co-headquartered in Nashville, Tennessee and Greenwood Village, Colorado. The company's common stock is expected to trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol: EVHC. Bass, Berry & Sims served as lead counsel on the transaction, led by Jim Jenkins. Read more.

AmSurg logo

Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

Inside the FCA blogInside the FCA blog features ongoing updates related to the False Claims Act (FCA), including insight on the latest legal decisions, regulatory developments and FCA settlements. The blog provides timely updates for corporate boards, directors, compliance managers, general counsel and other parties interested in the organizational impact and legal developments stemming from issues potentially giving rise to FCA liability.

Read More >

The Volcker Rule: Haste Makes Waste or Need For Speed?


December 16, 2011

Although many portions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the "Dodd-Frank Act") are controversial, few provisions have drawn as much debate as the Volcker Rule. Briefly, the Volcker Rule places significant restrictions on banking entities' and nonbank financial companies' proprietary trading and ownership of hedge and private equity funds. On October 12, 2011, four of the five financial industry regulators proposed complex and detailed regulations to implement the Volcker Rule. These regulations spanned 127 pages of the Federal Register and contained nearly 400 separate requests for comment (most of which included multiple questions) (the "Joint Proposed Rules"). The Commodity Futures Trading Commission ("CFTC") has yet to release proposed Volcker Rule regulations, but CFTC Chairman Gary Gensler stated last week that "I would envision that we would move forward with a rule similar to what other regulators have done."

The Joint Proposed Rules state that "[c]omments should be received on or before January 13, 2012," a deadline that many in the financial services industry believe is too short. On November 30, 2011, several financial industry trade associations sent a letter to the regulators requesting that the comment period be extended "to the later of 90 days after the current deadline of January 13th or to 60 days after the CFTC releases its proposed regulations," due to the complexity and importance of the regulations.

Several high-ranking Republican members of the House Financial Services Committee followed suit on December 7, 2011, writing that "[t]he implementation of the Volcker Rule is too important an issue to rush" and "we believe your agencies should extend the comment period by at least 30 days." The Financial Services Committee letter also calls the regulators to testify at a hearing regarding the Volcker Rule on January 18, 2012 (five days after the current comment period on the Joint Proposed Rules closes).

Even the Volcker Rule's namesake, former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker, has said that the Joint Proposed Rules are "much more complicated than I would like to see."

Consumer advocates, however, have contended the Volcker Rule's implementing regulations cannot be finalized quickly enough. For example, on December 9, 2011, financial reform group Better Markets urged regulators to "proceed with your rulemaking process as scheduled," stating that "[t]he industry's relentless effort to derail or delay this rule must be rejected."

According to Paul Volcker, the policy behind the Volcker Rule is simple enough – "I don't want banks doing the kinds of things they were doing." Concerns about maintaining market liquidity and preserving financial institutions' ability to function as market makers, however, have turned implementation of the Volcker Rule into a fierce battleground. When these concerns are coupled with the complexity of the Joint Proposed Rules, financial industry regulators now find themselves challenged by the delicate balancing act involved in setting a feasible timeframe for finalizing those rules.

We will continue to monitor developments regarding the Volcker Rule implementation, and will provide updates when available.

Related Professionals

Related Services


Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.