Close X
Attorney Spotlight

How does Jordana Nelson's prior experience as a general counsel inform her work with firm clients? Read more>

Search

Close X

Experience

Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

The M&A Advisor Winner 2017The M&A Advisor announced the winners of the 16th Annual M&A Advisor Awards on Monday, November 13 at the 2017 M&A Advisor Awards. Bass, Berry & Sims was named a winner in the two categories related to the following deals:

M&A Deal of the Year (from $1B-$5B) – Acquisition of CLARCOR Inc. by Parker Hannifin Corporation

Corporate/Strategic Deal of the Year (over $1B) – Acquisition of BNC Bancorp by Pinnacle Financial Partners

Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

Regulation A+

It seems that lately there has been a noticeable uptick in Regulation A+ activity, including several recent Reg A+ securities offerings where the stock now successfully trades on national exchanges. In light of this activity, we have published a set of FAQs about Regulation A+ securities offerings to help companies better understand this "mini-IPO" offering process, as well as pros and cons compared to a traditional underwritten IPO.

Read now

Comcast CEO Fined $500,000 for Failure to File HSR on Acquisition of Comcast Stock

Publications

December 28, 2011

The Department of Justice Antitrust Division has settled its claims that Brian L. Roberts, the chief executive officer of Comcast Corp., violated the notification filing requirements of the Hart-Scott-Rodino ("HSR") Act by acquiring Comcast voting stock without first filing notification with the federal antitrust regulators. Roberts has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $500,000.

The HSR Act sets notification and waiting period requirements that must be observed by individuals and companies based on the size of their holdings before they consummate acquisitions resulting in holding voting stock or assets above a certain value (currently, $66 million). Violations of the HSR Act can result in civil penalties in lawsuits brought in federal courts by the Department of Justice. For a party that violated the HSR Act before Feb. 10, 2009, the maximum civil penalty is $11,000 a day for each day the party is in violation of the Act; for violations of the HSR Act on or after Feb. 10, 2009, the maximum civil penalty is $16,000 a day.

In 2002, Roberts filed an HSR notification regarding his acquisition of Comcast voting stock from a merger between Comcast and AT&T Corp. Under the HSR rules, Roberts could acquire additional Comcast stock for up to five years without having to file another HSR notification, unless he acquired enough stock to cross a higher notification threshold. After the five year exemption period expired, Roberts acquired additional Comcast stock on multiple occasions as part of his compensation package, without making any HSR filings. In August 2009, Roberts made a corrective filing with the Premerger Notification Office disclosing his recent failures to make HSR filings. Roberts faced potential penalties of approximately $8 million.

This was not Roberts' first failure to make required HSR filings, a factor which likely led to the substantial penalty. Roberts had twice before made corrective filings, conceding that he had made acquisitions that were reportable under the HSR Act but claiming he inadvertently failed to file notification under the HSR Act. For both previous transactions, federal antitrust enforcers opted not to seek civil penalties.

What’s Next?

This substantial civil penalty illustrates that premerger notification rules can ensnare executives with a significant stake in their companies who acquire voting stock as part of their compensation. The rules cover acquisitions of voting stock by executives as a result of grants of restricted stock, the exercise or vesting of options, warrants or similar securities, and purchases in the open market or pursuant to dividend reinvestment plans or employee stock purchase plans. Moreover, the Department of Justice is unlikely to be sympathetic to repeat violators of the HSR Act. Executives should assess whether their acquisitions of voting stock as compensation are subject to HSR notification requirements. In addition, executives and their companies should ensure that compliance programs are in place to assure that acquirers will be proactive in assessing whether an HSR filing is required for any given transaction.

If you have any questions about this Alert, please contact any of the attorneys in our Antitrust and Trade Practices group.


Related Services

Notice

Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.