Close X
Attorney Spotlight

Learn about Richard Arnholt's diverse government contracts practice and why he chose to pursue a career in the legal field. Read more>

Search

Close X

Experience

Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

In June 2017, Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: PNFP) closed a $1.9 billion merger with BNC Bancorp (NASDAQ: BNCN) pursuant to which BNC merged with and into Pinnacle. With the completion of the transaction, Pinnacle becomes a Top 50 U.S. Bank. The merger will create a four state footprint concentrated in 12 of the largest urban markets in the Southeast. 

Bass, Berry & Sims has served Pinnacle as primary corporate and securities counsel for more than 15 years and served as counsel on the transaction. Our attorneys were involved in all aspects related to the agreement, including tax, employee benefits and litigation. 

Read more details about the transaction here.

Pinnacle Financial Partners logo

Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

Regulation A+

It seems that lately there has been a noticeable uptick in Regulation A+ activity, including several recent Reg A+ securities offerings where the stock now successfully trades on national exchanges. In light of this activity, we have published a set of FAQs about Regulation A+ securities offerings to help companies better understand this "mini-IPO" offering process, as well as pros and cons compared to a traditional underwritten IPO.

Read now

Making Things Simple (Or Simpler, At Any Rate)

Publications

November 10, 2011

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ("CMS") recently issued certain regulatory rules and revisions in response to President Obama's January 18, 2011 Executive Order 13563, which called for government agencies to reduce unnecessary regulatory burdens on businesses. Specifically, on October 18, 2011, CMS issued a final rule simplifying patient rights notification requirements for ambulatory surgical centers ("ASCs") and also issued proposals for two additional sets of regulatory revisions dealing with (1) hospital and critical access hospital ("CAH") Conditions of Participation ("CoPs") and (2) other regulations affecting a wide range of healthcare settings. In the aggregate, CMS anticipates that these reforms will save more than $5 billion over five years.

ASC Final Rule

The main reform in the final rule for ASCs is CMS' announcement that ASCs will no longer be required to notify patients of their rights "in advance of the date of the procedure" but rather simply "prior to the start of the surgical procedure." The previous wording effectively prohibited an ASC from performing a surgery on the same day as the patient referral, and ASCs argued that it resulted in unnecessary scheduling inconveniences and travel issues for some patients. Now ASCs have the ability to perform same-day surgeries and still meet the patient notification requirement. CMS has also made certain technical corrections to the wording of ASC regulations that are not anticipated to have a substantive impact on ASC operations.

Hospital and CAH CoPs Proposed Rule

In proposing reforms to existing CoPs for hospitals and CAHs, CMS acknowledges that it has not comprehensively reviewed the CoPs in several years. One of the most noteworthy proposed revisions, if adopted, would allow a single governing body to oversee multiple hospitals within a healthcare system, as opposed to requiring each hospital within the system to have its own governing body. This is anticipated to provide greater efficiencies and flexibility to hospital systems.1 Among other proposals, CMS has also proposed the following reforms:

  • Eliminating the requirement that outpatient services be overseen by a single director;
  • Allowing CAHs to provide certain services, including radiology and laboratory services, under arrangement;
  • Clarifying that physicians and non-physicians need not have medical staff membership at a hospital in order to be granted privileges at the hospital; and
  • Permitting hospital patients or their caregivers to administer certain medications.

Other Medicare Proposed Rules

Another proposed rule, Regulatory Provisions to Promote Program Efficiency, Transparency, and Burden Reduction, introduces a variety of regulatory reforms that affect several types of providers and suppliers, including ASCs, hospitals and end-stage renal disease ("ESRD") facilities. One proposal that applies to physicians and non-physician practitioners is the elimination of the automatic deactivation of a supplier's Medicare enrollment if the supplier has not submitted a claim for 12 consecutive months. In issuing the proposal, CMS indicates that it is more concerned with organizations that fail to submit a claim within a 12-month period than it is with individual practitioners who in some instances may not treat Medicare patients frequently. CMS has also proposed several other reforms, including the following:

  • Easing the Life Safety Code standards that are applicable to ESRD facilities, given their non-residential nature;
  • Eliminating the specific list of emergency equipment that ASCs are currently required to maintain on their premises;
  • Removing the re-enrollment bar (which may vary from one to three years) when Medicare providers or suppliers have not responded timely to revalidation requests or other requests for additional information; and
  • Updating certain obsolete regulations, such as removal of outdated personnel qualification language for physical therapists and occupational therapists and removal of certain vestigial provisions governing initial determinations, appeals, and reopenings of Medicare claims.

The provisions of the final rule affecting ASCs become effective on December 23, 2011. Any comments related to either of the two proposed rules discussed above are also due to CMS by December 23, 2011. If you have any questions regarding this Health Law Update, please contact any of the attorneys in our Healthcare Practice Group.


1 But note that hospitals and CAHs accredited by The Joint Commission or other accrediting agencies may have to inquire into the manner in which these new liberalizations intersect with Joint Commission or other applicable accreditation requirements. While a full discussion of how the two sets of rules may intersect is beyond the scope of this article, note that The Joint Commission has addressed the governing body issue in a frequently asked questions document, stating that the same individuals can make up the governing body at more than one hospital as long as the responsibilities for each hospital's governing body are performed independently of carrying out responsibilities for another hospital. The FAQ document is available online at http://www.jointcommission.org/faqs_ccn/.


Related Services

Notice

Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.