Close X

Attorney Spotlight

How does Eli Richardson's past work with the federal government inform his client interactions? Find out more>

Search

Close X

Experience

Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

In June 2016, AmSurg Corp. and Envision Healthcare Holdings, Inc. (Envision) announced they have signed a definitive merger agreement pursuant to which the companies will combine in an all-stock transaction. Upon completion of the merger, which is expected to be tax-free to the shareholders of both organizations, the combined company will be named Envision Healthcare Corporation and co-headquartered in Nashville, Tennessee and Greenwood Village, Colorado. The company's common stock is expected to trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol: EVHC. Bass, Berry & Sims served as lead counsel on the transaction, led by Jim Jenkins. Read more.

AmSurg logo


Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

Inside the FCA blogInside the FCA blog features ongoing updates related to the False Claims Act (FCA), including insight on the latest legal decisions, regulatory developments and FCA settlements. The blog provides timely updates for corporate boards, directors, compliance managers, general counsel and other parties interested in the organizational impact and legal developments stemming from issues potentially giving rise to FCA liability.

Read More >

HACs Are Here to Stay: CMS Finalizes Medicaid Payment Adjustments For Healthcare Acquired Conditions

Publications

August 10, 2011

In an earlier edition of Health Reform IMPACT,1 we reported on the proposed rule by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ("CMS") that would implement health reform-mandated Medicaid payment adjustments for Provider-Preventable Conditions ("PPCs"). CMS has now finalized these payment adjustments in a rule published June 6, 2011 (the "Final Rule").2 Apart from providing general clarifications and making the change to the effective date discussed below, the Final Rule is largely unchanged from the Proposed Rule.

New Effective Date

As proposed, the Final Rule was scheduled to go into effect on July 1, 2011. Recognizing the difficult timeframes involved, however, CMS has delayed the Final Rule’s effective date until July 1, 2012, to allow states time to offer adequate guidance to providers.

General Clarifications

The preamble commentary to the Final Rule clarifies the following:

  • Conditions identified as Medicare’s hospital-acquired conditions ("HACs"), known for purposes of Medicaid as healthcare-acquired conditions ("HCACs"),3 as well as conditions identified in three Medicare National Coverage Determinations ("NCDs"),4 are the minimum requirement for state PPC non-payment policies.
  • States have the flexibility, if desired, to identify additional conditions as PPCs under their Medicaid programs.
  • Although the three Medicare NCDs are applicable in any healthcare service setting where these events may occur, the HCAC category applies only to inpatient hospital settings under Medicaid. There are no payment reductions for conditions existing prior to treatment by the provider or on admission to the hospital. Further, payment reductions are limited to PPCs that would otherwise result in a payment increase and those that a state can "reasonably isolate for nonpayment the portion of the payment directly related to treatment for, and related to, the [PPC]."5

If you have questions regarding the information in this alert, please contact any of the attorneys in our Healthcare Practice Group.


1  See "HACs Come To Medicaid: Another Quality Payment Adjustment," March 24, 2011.
2  76 Fed. Reg. 32816 (June 6, 2011).
3  The Final Rule incorporates conditions identified as Medicare’s HACs with the exception of Deep Vein Thrombosis/Pulmonary Embolism ("DVT/PE") as related to total knee replacement and total hip replacement for pediatric and obstetric populations.
4  The three NCDs include: Surgery on the wrong patient, wrong surgery on a patient, and wrong site surgery.
76 Fed. Reg. 32816, 32819 (June 6, 2011).


In Case You Missed It:

Related Services

Notice

Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.