Close X

Attorney Spotlight

How does Eli Richardson's past work with the federal government inform his client interactions? Find out more>

Search

Close X

Experience

Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

In June 2016, AmSurg Corp. and Envision Healthcare Holdings, Inc. (Envision) announced they have signed a definitive merger agreement pursuant to which the companies will combine in an all-stock transaction. Upon completion of the merger, which is expected to be tax-free to the shareholders of both organizations, the combined company will be named Envision Healthcare Corporation and co-headquartered in Nashville, Tennessee and Greenwood Village, Colorado. The company's common stock is expected to trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol: EVHC. Bass, Berry & Sims served as lead counsel on the transaction, led by Jim Jenkins. Read more.

AmSurg logo


Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

Inside the FCA blogInside the FCA blog features ongoing updates related to the False Claims Act (FCA), including insight on the latest legal decisions, regulatory developments and FCA settlements. The blog provides timely updates for corporate boards, directors, compliance managers, general counsel and other parties interested in the organizational impact and legal developments stemming from issues potentially giving rise to FCA liability.

Read More >

New Pre-Merger Filing Rules Go Into Effect August 18, 2011

Publications

July 29, 2011
On July 7, 2011, the Federal Trade Commission announced revised Hart-Scott-Rodino ("HSR") pre-merger notification rules and a revised notification and report form for those transactions that must be reviewed by the antitrust enforcement agencies prior to being consummated. The revised rules and form, which are based on proposed rules issued in August 2010, streamline certain aspects of the HSR reporting process but also impose new reporting burdens.

A significant new requirement relates to a buyer's "associates." Generally, any entity that is under common operational control with the filing entity, even if the filing entity is not the majority owner of that entity, is considered an associate. Under the new reporting requirements, information regarding the buyer's associates that was not previously required to be reported, now must be reported. This change will be most burdensome for buyers affiliated with private equity firms, investment funds, master limited partnerships and similar entities that are commonly managed, but not necessarily commonly owned.

The new rules also add significant document submission requirements. The existing obligation to provide "4(c) documents" – documents which were prepared by or for an officer or director for the purpose of analyzing various competitive aspects of the proposed transaction – has been supplemented with a new obligation to provide "4(d) documents." Examples of 4(d) documents include confidential information memoranda that relate to the sale of the acquired entity or assets, reports by third-party advisors regarding various competitive aspects of the sale of the acquired entity or assets, and analyses of synergies or efficiencies prepared for the purpose of analyzing the acquisition.

In addition, the new rules add additional reporting requirements for companies that manufacture goods outside the U.S. for sale into the U.S.

The new rules do, however, streamline and simplify certain aspects of the reporting process. Most significantly, the new rules eliminate the mandate to provide revenues divided according to NAICS codes for the year 2002. This requirement was often extremely burdensome, and its elimination has been met with an enthusiastic reception. In addition, the new rules eliminate the requirement to provide the agencies with the parties' SEC filings.

The revised rules are effective August 18, 2011, and apply to any HSR filings made on or after that date.

In Case You Missed It:

Related Services

Notice

Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.