Close X
Attorney Spotlight

What is Shannon Wiley looking forward to at this year's Asembia Specialty Pharmacy Summit? Find out more>


Close X


Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

Primary Care Providers Win Challenge of CMS Interpretation of Enhanced Payment Law

With the help and support of the Tennessee Medical Association, 21 Tennessee physicians of underserved communities joined together and retained Bass, Berry & Sims to file suit against the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to stop improper collection efforts. Our team, led by David King, was successful in halting efforts to recoup TennCare payments that were used legitimately to expand services in communities that needed them. Read more

Tennessee Medical Association & Bass, Berry & Sims

Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

Download the Healthcare Fraud & Abuse Review 2017, authored by Bass, Berry & Sims

The Healthcare Fraud & Abuse Review 2017 details all healthcare-related False Claims Act settlements from last year, organized by particular sectors of the healthcare industry. In addition to reviewing all healthcare fraud-related settlements, the Review includes updates on enforcement-related litigation involving the Stark Law and Anti-Kickback Statute, and looks at the continued implications from the government's focus on enforcement efforts involving individual actors in connection with civil and criminal healthcare fraud investigations.

Click here to download the Review.

HACs Come To Medicaid: Another Quality Payment Adjustment


March 24, 2011

On February 17, 2011, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ("CMS") published a proposed rule (the "Proposed Rule")1 to implement the provision of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ("PPACA")2 requiring Medicaid payment adjustments for hospital-acquired conditions (“HACs”) and for other healthcare-acquired conditions ("HCACs").3 If finalized, the Proposed Rule will go into effect July 1, 2011, and would require state Medicaid programs to implement systems to identify HCAC claims for nonpayment and also implement requirements for provider self-reporting of HCACs in the Medicaid claims payment process.

In 2008, under the Medicare program, CMS stopped paying hospitals additional amounts for the treatment of certain HACs, which are specific preventable adverse conditions that were not present upon admission of the patient. Although CMS encouraged states to adopt Medicaid payment prohibitions on provider claims for HACs, CMS did not require that states implement nonpayment policies for HACs. As a result, a recent review by CMS revealed that 29 states are currently without HAC-related nonpayment policies. In states with existing HAC-related nonpayment policies, the review found that the policies vary tremendously from state to state. In an effort to provide consistency across Medicare and Medicaid, the Proposed Rule requires states to adopt, at a minimum, the current list of Medicare HACs.4 The Proposed Rule also requires that states review and update its HCAC list to ensure continued consistency with the Medicare HAC list.

At the same time, the Proposed Rule attempts to offer states flexibility to design individual HCAC policies for nonpayment and to create quality-related programs suitable for their own Medicaid program and health marketplace by allowing states to exceed the federally established minimum HAC standards. To accommodate this goal, the Proposed Rule introduces a new "catch-all" term – Provider Preventable Condition ("PPC") – designed to allow states to include conditions and provider types other than those identified as HACs for Medicare.

1 76 Fed. Reg. 9283 (Feb. 17, 2011).
2 Pub. L. 111-148, Section 2702 of the Health Reform Legislation.
3 Note that, in the context of Medicaid, the health reform legislation and regulations refer to HACs as "healthcare-acquired conditions" instead of "hospital-acquired conditions."
4 The list of HACs includes, among other conditions, catheter-associated urinary tract infections and vascular catheter-associated blood stream infections.

Related Professionals

Related Services


Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.