Close X
Attorney Spotlight

What is Shannon Wiley looking forward to at this year's Asembia Specialty Pharmacy Summit? Find out more>


Close X


Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

Primary Care Providers Win Challenge of CMS Interpretation of Enhanced Payment Law

With the help and support of the Tennessee Medical Association, 21 Tennessee physicians of underserved communities joined together and retained Bass, Berry & Sims to file suit against the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to stop improper collection efforts. Our team, led by David King, was successful in halting efforts to recoup TennCare payments that were used legitimately to expand services in communities that needed them. Read more

Tennessee Medical Association & Bass, Berry & Sims

Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

Download the Healthcare Fraud & Abuse Review 2017, authored by Bass, Berry & Sims

The Healthcare Fraud & Abuse Review 2017 details all healthcare-related False Claims Act settlements from last year, organized by particular sectors of the healthcare industry. In addition to reviewing all healthcare fraud-related settlements, the Review includes updates on enforcement-related litigation involving the Stark Law and Anti-Kickback Statute, and looks at the continued implications from the government's focus on enforcement efforts involving individual actors in connection with civil and criminal healthcare fraud investigations.

Click here to download the Review.

Add Registry Checks To Your Checklist: New Tennessee Requirement


February 1, 2011

Effective October 1, 2010, all healthcare professionals and facilities licensed in the State of Tennessee must perform a "registry check"1 prior to employing or contracting with any person involved in direct patient care2 for whom a background check has not been completed.3 A "registry check" includes the following: (1) a state-by-state look in any state where the person has lived for the past seven years of the national sex offender public registry Web site; (2) the adult abuse registry for any state where the person has lived for the past seven years (if the state(s) maintain(s) such registry(ies)); and (3) the Tennessee Department of Health's elder abuse registry. The Tennessee Department of Health has posted links to these registries on its Web site.

In addition, healthcare practices or facilities may contract with an entity to perform such registry checks and may rely upon written documentation from that entity that the person who will be involved in direct patient care is not listed on any of these registries.4 If the healthcare practice or facility complies with this requirement (by either conducting its own registry checks or contracting with an entity to conduct them), it will not be subject to civil or criminal liability solely based upon the information provided through a registry check.5 If the person is listed on any of these registries, the healthcare practice or facility may not employ or contract with the person to provide direct patient care. Penalties for non-compliance with this requirement include a Class B misdemeanor for a healthcare practice6 and potential licensure revocation for a healthcare facility.7

In addition, more stringent requirements8 are imposed on organizations that contract with the Tennessee Department of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities and provide intellectual disabilities services for residential services, day services or supported employment services.9 Such organizations are required to complete a criminal background check prior to employing any person who will be in a position that involves providing direct care to a service recipient.10 If a current employee of such organization has a change of responsibilities that includes direct care to a service recipient, then the organization shall have a criminal background check completed prior to such change. The organization shall inform the employee that it will conduct a background check, and the employee must make specified disclosures.11

If you have any questions about this Health Law Update, please do not hesitate to contact any of the attorneys in our Healthcare Practice Group. 

1 This new registry check requirement was promulgated pursuant to House Bill 2284, which passed on June 3, 2010 and was signed by Governor Bredesen on June 23, 2010 as Public Chapter No. 1084. The new statute amends Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 33, Title 34, Title 63, Title 68, and Title 71 and applies to, among others, any healthcare facility licensed under Title 68 of the Tennessee Code Annotated, and any healthcare professional licensed under any chapter of Title 63 or under Chapters 24 and 140 of Title 68. See Pub. Chapter 1084 (2010); available at
2 The term "direct patient care" is not defined. The new statute says that the "registry check" requirement is not intended to apply to "contracted, external staff who provide such services as cleaning services, maintenance of office or medical equipment or other services where direct patient contact is not intended." Id. See also Tenn. Code Ann. § 63-1-149(d); Tenn. Code Ann. § 68-11-271(d). Unfortunately, this language, by focusing on "contracted, external staff," leaves some uncertainty as to the application of the statute to internal staff, e.g., W-2 employees, who provide cleaning services, maintenance of office or medical equipment or other services where direct patient contact is not intended.
3 See Pub. Chapter 1084 (2010); available at As a practical matter, many healthcare providers already conduct background checks, at least of certain classes of employees, in order to gauge malpractice and other liability risks.
4 Id. See also Tenn. Code Ann. § 63-1-149(c); Tenn. Code Ann. § 68-11-271(e).
5 This immunity shall extend to a claim related to the facility's refusal to employ or contract with a person based on information obtained from a registry check. Id.
6 See Tenn. Code Ann. § 63-1-123. This section contains general penalties for all violations of Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 63, Chapter 1.
7 See Tenn. Code Ann. § 68-11-207(a)(1). This section contains general penalties for all violations of Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 68, Chapter 11, Part 2.
8 Penalties for violation of any provision of Title 33 include revocation or restriction of a license as well as potential civil monetary penalties. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 33-2-407(a)-(b).
9 See Pub. Chapter No. 1084, which amended Tenn. Code Ann. § 33-2-1202 by adding a new subsection (e).
10 Id. § 33-2-1202(e)(1).
11 The employee shall:
-Provide past work history containing a continuous description of activities over the past five (5) years;
-Identify at least three (3) individuals as personal references, one (1) of whom shall have known the applicant for at least five (5) years;
-Release all investigative records to the organization for examination for the purpose of verifying the accuracy of criminal violation information contained on an application to work for the organization; and
-Either supply fingerprint samples to be submitted for a criminal history records check to be conducted by the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation or the Federal Bureau of Investigation or release information for a criminal background investigation by a state licensed private investigation company. Id.

Related Services


Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.