Close X
Attorney Spotlight

How does Jessie Zeigler anticipate the intersection of privacy and smart technology will impact the future of litigation? Find out more>

Search

Close X

Experience

Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

Primary Care Providers Win Challenge of CMS Interpretation of Enhanced Payment Law

With the help and support of the Tennessee Medical Association, 21 Tennessee physicians of underserved communities joined together and retained Bass, Berry & Sims to file suit against the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to stop improper collection efforts. Our team, led by David King, was successful in halting efforts to recoup TennCare payments that were used legitimately to expand services in communities that needed them. Read more

Tennessee Medical Association & Bass, Berry & Sims

Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

Healthcare Private Equity Compliance Checklist

The complex and ever-changing healthcare regulatory and enforcement environment, including increased focus on the role of private equity firms in their portfolio companies, make compliance a top priority for private equity firms investing in healthcare companies. The best way to limit your exposure as a private equity firm is to avoid a compliance misstep in the first place. Additionally, an effective and robust compliance program for your portfolio healthcare company makes it much more attractive to potential buyers and helps you avoid an unexpected and costly investigation or valuation hit down the road. Download the Healthcare Private Equity Compliance Checklist to assess whether your portfolio company's compliance program is up-to-date.

Click here to download the checklist.

Matt Gibson

Director of Litigation Technology

Nashville
(615) 259-6155 TEL
(615) 742-0433 FAX

Matt Gibson

Director of Litigation Technology

Nashville
(615) 259-6155 TEL
(615) 742-0433 FAX
Nashville
(615) 259-6155 TEL
(615) 742-0433 FAX

Matt Gibson leads the firm's litigation technology department, collaborating with attorneys and clients on all technical matters related to electronic evidence – in discovery and at trial. With more than 14 years at the firm, Matt has assisted with e-discovery since before the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure recognized the challenges presented by electronically stored information. He consults on projects relating to litigation readiness, data preservation, forensic collections, defensible data reduction, document review and production, evidence analysis and evidence presentation at hearings. With an eye toward cost containment and appropriately applying proven – yet new – technologies to litigation, Matt ensures that the firm's litigators offer innovative and effective solutions to clients grappling with the volume, complexity and expense of electronic evidence.

Matt Gibson leads the firm's litigation technology department, collaborating with attorneys and clients on all technical matters related to electronic evidence – in discovery and at trial. With more than 14 years at the firm, Matt has assisted with e-discovery since before the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure recognized the challenges presented by electronically stored information. He consults on projects relating to litigation readiness, data preservation, forensic collections, defensible data reduction, document review and production, evidence analysis and evidence presentation at hearings. With an eye toward cost containment and appropriately applying proven – yet new – technologies to litigation, Matt ensures that the firm's litigators offer innovative and effective solutions to clients grappling with the volume, complexity and expense of electronic evidence.

Matt oversees the firm's vendor relationships and collaborates with clients' preferred vendors. 

He and his team have managed hundreds of technical matters with the majority involving document review and production. Many have involved complex e-discovery during bet-the-company litigation for clients large and small. Representative projects include:

  • Litigation Readiness Plans – preparing technical plans for clients' legal and IT teams to reference once a duty to preserve data might have been triggered. 
  • Complex Data Preservation – helping attorneys develop a plan for a hospital client to preserve its entire revenue management infrastructure – both hardware and software – without interfering with continued business operations.
  • Assisted Review Technologies – helping attorneys use continuous active learning (CAL) technology, and its "predictive coding" predecessor, to identify key documents within data dumps from adversaries – and to prepare our own clients' document productions. In one matter, we used CAL with an offshore-review team to locate more than 86% of our client's relevant documents while only reviewing 50.2% of the corpus. 
  • Trial Presentation – helping manage the creation of demonstrative animations to support a successful motion to dismiss punitive damages; assisting with evidence presentation during numerous jury and bench proceedings in federal, state, local jurisdictions, both judicial and administrative venues.

Matt has certification from the Association of Certified E-Discovery Specialists (ACEDS)

+ Read More

- Read Less

Memberships

International Legal Technology Association (ILTA)

Association of Certified E-Discovery Specialists (ACEDS)

Notice

Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.